As Australia braces for what is being dubbed a “boomergeddon,” experts are urging society to rethink its approach to death. Dr Hannah Gould, a prominent figure in the field of death studies and author of *How to Die in the 21st Century*, argues that the forthcoming surge in the aging population will challenge traditional notions of mortality and highlight the importance of autonomy in end-of-life decisions.
The Coming Wave of Mortality
By 2040, Australia is expected to experience a significant increase in its annual death rate, with projections suggesting it could double compared to current figures. This demographic shift, fuelled by the aging baby boomer population, is set to place unprecedented pressure on healthcare and funeral services across the nation. Dr Gould characterises this shift as a moment of reckoning, where discussions about what constitutes a “good death” become increasingly relevant.
“The overwhelming value of end-of-life decisions, particularly among the baby boomer population, is this value of right, autonomy and control,” Gould explains. This desire for control often manifests in bespoke arrangements, from tailored medical interventions to unique burial practices. However, she cautions against the misconception that such control is universally accessible or achievable.
The Complexities of a “Good Death”
Gould, who also teaches Buddhist Studies at the University of Melbourne, reflects on the evolving attitudes toward death across generations. While older generations may actively seek to orchestrate their final moments, younger individuals, particularly millennials, often feel a lack of resources and options. “Control is not a value that I’ve ever had a part of,” she admits, suggesting that the societal shift towards autonomy in dying may not resonate with those facing economic pressures and uncertainty.
Having experienced her own personal losses, Gould’s engagement with death has evolved from childhood fears to a scholarly pursuit. Now, she advocates for a broader understanding of what constitutes a “good death.” She expresses frustration at the oversimplification of death experiences, particularly when they are labelled as “bad” or “losing a battle” with illness.
The Personalisation of Funerals
The trend towards personalised funerals has gained momentum, with many expressing a desire to return to nature in their final arrangements. “I always hear, ‘Can’t you just put me into a nice meadow and put a sapling on top of me?’” Gould remarks, emphasising the naivety of such ideas without a grounded understanding of deathcare. Her insights reveal the complexities and environmental implications of these choices, underscoring the need for informed discussions around death and its logistics.
Gould’s experience working in crematoriums and funeral homes has also made her a staunch advocate for the welfare of deathcare workers. She highlights the psychological pressures and hazards that accompany the growing demands for elaborate funeral services, which often go unrecognised in the public discourse.
The Need for Open Conversations
Despite the myriad of options emerging in the deathcare sector, society remains largely averse to discussing mortality. Gould believes that advancements in technology, such as AI-assisted planning, might further entrench this fear. “It robs people of being carers,” she argues, suggesting that the profound human experience of caring for a dying loved one should not be outsourced to machines.
In her book, Gould distills her expertise into six essential lessons on mortality, covering topics from grief to memorialisation. Yet, even she admits to procrastination when it comes to her own end-of-life planning. Her one crucial piece of advice? “Know who your legal next of kin is,” she stresses, recognising the importance of clear communication regarding one’s wishes, especially for those in complex family situations.
Why it Matters
As we face a future marked by significant demographic changes, conversations about death and dying must evolve. Dr Hannah Gould’s insights illuminate the pressing need for society to embrace discussions about mortality with honesty and compassion. By recognising the complexities of end-of-life care and the diverse needs of individuals, we can work towards a more informed and humane approach to death, ensuring that everyone has the right to a dignified farewell that respects their autonomy and wishes.
