**
A new study by pulmonary specialists and public health experts warns that policies enacted during Donald Trump’s second term could lead to a significant increase in lung diseases and premature deaths among Americans. The findings, published in the *American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine*, highlight the ramifications of healthcare cuts, environmental deregulations, and other detrimental policies that threaten the respiratory health of millions.
Warnings from Pulmonary Experts
Adam Gaffney, a pulmonary physician and professor at Harvard Medical School, led the research and expressed grave concerns over the implications of the Trump administration’s actions. The report emphasises that the cumulative effect of these policies constitutes an “attack on Americans’ lungs,” potentially resulting in millions of unnecessary fatalities in the coming years.
The analysis scrutinises ten specific areas where policy changes have been made, including healthcare access, environmental regulations, workplace protections, and the uptake of vaccinations.
Critical Cuts to Healthcare Programmes
One of the most alarming findings relates to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), which slashed over $1 trillion from health programmes. This legislative package represents the most extensive rollback of federal healthcare funding in American history, jeopardising access to vital services for millions reliant on Medicaid.

Gaffney provided a stark example: “Imagine a patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who loses their coverage and stops visiting their primary care physician. Without access to a pulmonologist or necessary medications, their condition could deteriorate rapidly.”
In response to the report, White House spokesperson Kush Desai defended the OBBBA, claiming that it includes necessary reforms to eliminate waste and strengthen Medicaid for those who depend on it.
Environmental Rollbacks and Health Risks
The study also highlights the Trump administration’s decision to weaken numerous air pollution standards, which has raised immediate concerns about public health. Recent rollbacks on limits concerning soot and mercury emissions are projected to exacerbate respiratory conditions, leading to increased cases of asthma and more hospital admissions.
Mary B. Rice, co-author of the study and director at the Center for Climate, Health and the Global Environment at Harvard, condemned the administration’s prioritisation of economic gains for polluters over the health of American citizens.
Moreover, delayed clean energy initiatives and attempts to restrict California’s ability to mandate electric vehicle sales could result in heightened air pollution levels, which the report warns could have “irreversible” impacts on lung health.
Compounding Risks for Vulnerable Communities
The report underscores the intersectionality of health risks posed by policy decisions, particularly for vulnerable populations. For example, individuals with chronic respiratory diseases may face increased exposure to pollutants while simultaneously losing healthcare coverage.

Gaffney noted that misinformation regarding vaccines, coupled with funding cuts to public health initiatives, compounds these risks. Vulnerable groups, including low-income communities and racial minorities, are expected to bear the brunt of these dangerous policies, as they are already disproportionately affected by lung diseases.
Liz Scott, a senior director at the American Lung Association, called attention to the severe consequences these federal actions will have on public health, particularly for children and the most vulnerable in society.
Why it Matters
The implications of this study extend beyond the immediate health risks, touching on broader societal inequalities. As lung diseases affect individuals across various socioeconomic strata, the most vulnerable populations will likely experience the most severe consequences of these policies. The findings underscore an urgent need for policymakers to prioritise public health and implement comprehensive reforms to ensure the well-being of all Americans. Without decisive action, the health of future generations hangs in the balance.