**
The Canadian startup ecosystem is grappling with a significant capital shortage, a situation exacerbated by the recent decision of prominent venture firm Y Combinator (YC) to halt investments in Canadian-incorporated companies. This move, initially intended to enhance funding access for startups reincorporating in the United States, has reignited discussions about the urgent need for reform within Canada’s innovation landscape. As the disparity in venture capital becomes increasingly evident, experts are advocating for a model inspired by the United Kingdom’s successful investment schemes.
The Capital Gap: A Stark Reality
Garry Tan, president of Y Combinator, recently highlighted the stark contrast in investment opportunities between Canada and the U.S., suggesting that startups moving south could potentially double their access to capital. Although YC reversed its decision following backlash from the Canadian tech community, the underlying issue remains: Canadian startups are struggling to secure the funding they need to thrive.
Recent figures underscore this crisis. Venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz, known as a16z, reported raising an astonishing US$15 billion across five new funds in early January, a sum that eclipses the total of US$2.1 billion raised by all Canadian venture-capital firms throughout 2025. This disparity reflects a broader trend where only 32.4 per cent of Canadian-founded startups that secured $1 million in funding were incorporated in Canada. Such a trend not only hampers job creation but also threatens tax revenue and intellectual property ownership, as these vital assets increasingly migrate to the U.S.
Learning from the UK: The SEIS and EIS Model
To address the capital flight and foster a more robust innovation ecosystem, Canadian policymakers could benefit from examining the UK’s Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme (SEIS) and Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS). Established in 2012, these initiatives have channelled over $63 billion into 59,000 innovative startups, resulting in 386,000 jobs and $50 billion in annual revenue as of 2023.
The SEIS and EIS programmes employ tax incentives to attract investment, converting stagnant wealth from savings and real estate into active funding for startups. They offer three key benefits: income tax credits for investors, the ability to offset investment losses against income, and an exemption from capital gains tax on shares acquired through these schemes.
For instance, a $100,000 investment in a pre-seed startup could yield a $50,000 tax credit immediately. Should the startup fail, the remaining $50,000 could be offset against the investor’s income, providing an additional tax relief of approximately $27,000 at the highest tax rate. This structure essentially reduces the effective risk for investors to around $23,000 while enhancing their potential returns due to the capital gains exemption.
Unlocking Dormant Wealth in Canada
Canadians currently hold over $470 billion in Guaranteed Investment Certificates (GICs) and an additional $8.5 trillion in real estate. While these asset classes offer security, they also limit potential returns. By implementing a series of tax incentives similar to those in the UK, the Canadian government could encourage professionals—such as doctors, lawyers, and engineers—to reallocate a fraction of their wealth into startup investments.
Even a mere 0.1 per cent of this dormant wealth could unlock an impressive $9 billion for Canadian startups, significantly surpassing last year’s total venture-capital funding. Moreover, this influx of capital could attract experienced professionals into the innovation ecosystem, creating a cycle where successful entrepreneurs reinvest their wealth and knowledge into the next generation of startups.
The Imperative for Change
The current state of Canada’s innovation ecosystem is unsustainable. With the government recognising the need to adapt, Minister of AI and Digital Innovation Evan Solomon has expressed a commitment to ensuring that Canadian innovations are commercialised domestically. The SEIS and EIS models from the UK offer a proven framework for fostering job creation and revenue generation without necessitating extensive public expenditure.
As American investors dominate 58 per cent of the venture capital landscape in Canada, the question is no longer about whether the country can afford to adopt a similar approach; it is whether it can afford to ignore the pressing need for reform.
Why it Matters
The future of Canada’s innovation ecosystem hinges on its ability to retain and attract investment. By implementing strategies that incentivise local investment in startups, the country can not only stem the tide of capital flight but also cultivate a thriving environment for innovation and entrepreneurship. The success of Canadian startups is vital for economic growth, job creation, and maintaining a competitive edge on the global stage. Without decisive action, Canada risks falling further behind in the innovation race, losing its brightest minds and most promising ideas to more welcoming environments.