**
Former President Donald Trump has recently reignited his controversial rhetoric regarding Iran’s Kharg Island, a pivotal oil export hub. His statements, made over the weekend, reflect a longstanding desire to control Iranian oil resources, further highlighting a troubling trend of fossil-fuel imperialism in U.S. foreign policy. Experts warn that this mindset not only flouts international law but also poses significant risks to global stability and climate efforts.
A Longstanding Obsession
During a recent address, Trump confidently declared his intention to “take the oil in Iran,” a phrase that has echoed through his public life for over a decade. His comments have drawn sharp criticism from analysts who assert that they reveal a dangerous sense of entitlement over foreign resources. Patrick Bigger, co-director of the Transition Security Project, noted, “Trump genuinely believes that the U.S. is entitled to whatever resource it desires. It’s a ‘might-makes-right’ mentality that is both abhorrent and profoundly misguided.”
This rhetoric has real-world implications. As Trump plans to provide an update on the ongoing conflict with Iran, he has suggested that peace could be on the horizon, causing a notable uptick in stock market confidence. However, Iran’s response remains defiant, insisting on guarantees against future assaults before any ceasefire can be negotiated. The conflict continues unabated, with Iran recently targeting a fully loaded oil tanker in Dubai, underscoring the escalating tensions.
The Risks of Militarised Resource Acquisition
Trump’s strategy, should he attempt to assert control over Kharg Island, would not be a simple endeavour. The island is crucial, accounting for 90% of Iran’s oil exports, and taking it would undoubtedly provoke severe retaliation from Tehran. Military analysts caution that any U.S. operation to seize this vital infrastructure would likely invite catastrophic consequences, both regionally and globally. Handjani, an energy lawyer at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, remarked, “If the U.S. were to take 90% of Iran’s exports offline, Iran would likely retaliate by targeting oil-exporting facilities across the Persian Gulf.” Such an escalation could send oil prices skyrocketing and destabilise the global economy.
Furthermore, Trump’s fixation on controlling foreign oil is not new. His 1988 comments during a promotional tour for *The Art of the Deal* openly discussed the need to “do a number” on Kharg Island. This pattern continued throughout his presidency, where he suggested that the U.S. had the right to Iraqi and Syrian oil, perpetuating the misguided notion that military intervention could justify resource appropriation.
The Fossil Fuel Imperialism Agenda
Critics argue that Trump’s statements and actions reveal a broader agenda of fossil fuel imperialism, one that prioritises short-term profits over long-term sustainability. Bigger emphasised that the push for increased drilling in the U.S. as a result of the ongoing conflict in the Middle East serves only to entrench reliance on fossil fuels, making it harder to transition to renewable energy sources.
The war in Iran has already inflicted immense human suffering and disrupted global energy supplies, yet fossil fuel companies are reaping substantial profits amid soaring oil prices. As these corporations benefit, the climate crisis worsens, locking us into a future dominated by fossil fuel dependency. Bigger points out, “The longer oil prices remain high, the more major oil companies will profit. We are witnessing the exploitation of oil resources for profit, regardless of the broader implications for our planet.”
Why it Matters
Trump’s fixation on seizing foreign oil is not merely a matter of geopolitical strategy; it’s a reflection of a dangerous ideology that equates resource acquisition with national strength. This mindset undermines international law and jeopardises global stability, all while contributing to the climate crisis. As the world grapples with the urgent need to transition to sustainable energy, Trump’s aggressive pursuit of fossil fuels serves as a stark reminder of the destructive legacy of imperialism. If we are to secure a livable planet for future generations, we must confront these attitudes head-on and advocate for a foreign policy rooted in cooperation, sustainability, and respect for sovereignty.
