**
In a disturbing trend reflecting the state of political discourse in the UK, threats against Members of Parliament (MPs) have surged, prompting the establishment of a new national democracy protection unit. This initiative, led by police chief Chris Balmer, aims to combat the alarming rise in anti-democratic crimes, with incidents doubling since 2019. Reports indicate that nearly 1,000 threats were documented last year alone, encompassing harassment, criminal damage, and even death threats, which have become increasingly commonplace.
Rising Tide of Threats
The statistics paint a grim picture: from 2019 to 2025, the Metropolitan Police’s Parliamentary Liaison Team received a staggering 4,064 reports of crimes against MPs. The figures reveal a clear upward trajectory, with 976 incidents recorded in 2025, a sharp increase from 364 in 2019. This escalation encompasses a variety of offences, including 2,066 cases of malicious communications, alongside harassment and property damage.
Security Minister Dan Jarvis recently remarked on the unprecedented volume and variety of threats facing elected officials today, underscoring the need for a robust response. Balmer’s role will involve coordinating intelligence on threats, advising police forces on categorising these crimes, and offering specialised support to officers investigating such cases.
Personal Impact on MPs
The implications of this surge in threats extend beyond statistics; they have profound effects on the lives of MPs and their families. Take Labour MP Sam Rushworth, for instance. After receiving repeated death threats from a constituent, he was compelled to enhance security measures at his home, including panic buttons and surveillance cameras. The psychological toll was significant, with Rushworth recounting that his family contemplated relocating due to the fear instilled by such threats.
Similarly, Natalie Fleet, another Labour MP, disclosed that she receives daily death threats. The atmosphere of hostility surrounding her role has made her family apprehensive about her safety. One particularly alarming incident involved a social media post that suggested she should “be shot”, shared by a local political figure. This not only heightened her anxiety but also necessitated police involvement as threats escalated.
Systematic Failures and Calls for Action
Despite the establishment of Operation Bridger—a national security programme for MPs launched after the tragic murders of Jo Cox in 2016 and Sir David Amess in 2021—many politicians argue that current measures are insufficient. Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, Jo Cox’s sister, expressed her dismay at the deteriorating situation nearly a decade after her sister’s death, stating, “We’re probably in a worse place.”
The inquiry into MPs’ security revealed that a staggering 96% of MPs have faced threatening behaviour or communications, highlighting the systemic failures in safeguarding those who represent the public. Balmer acknowledged the disproportionate targeting of female and minority MPs, emphasising the seriousness of the threats they face. “These are not idle threats,” he asserted, referencing past incidents where threats turned deadly.
The Role of the New Democracy Protection Unit
The newly formed Democracy Protection Portfolio, situated within the National Police Chiefs’ Council, is a direct response to the pressing need for enhanced security measures for MPs and candidates. Balmer’s leadership will focus on addressing the pervasive threats that have emerged, with a particular emphasis on the protection of underrepresented groups in politics.
As the political climate becomes increasingly fraught, the unit aims to provide a comprehensive approach to safeguarding democracy, ensuring that those who serve the public can do so without facing intimidation or violence.
Why it Matters
The rise in threats against MPs is not merely a statistic; it is a harrowing indication of the state of political discourse in the UK. The safety of elected officials is paramount for a functioning democracy. As threats escalate, so too does the risk of silencing diverse voices in politics. The establishment of the democracy protection unit is a critical step toward addressing this crisis, but it must be accompanied by a broader societal commitment to fostering respectful political dialogue and protecting those who are brave enough to serve the public.
