**
In a dramatic escalation of military actions, President Donald Trump has vowed to target key infrastructure across Iran unless a satisfactory agreement is reached by Tuesday night regarding the ongoing conflict involving the US and Israel. Trump’s alarming threats, which include promises to decimate critical facilities, have raised significant concerns both domestically and internationally about the implications of such strikes on civilian life and infrastructure.
The Threatened Infrastructure
In recent weeks, US and Israeli military operations have focused on Iranian infrastructure deemed essential to the civilian population. Reports indicate that strikes have specifically targeted steel plants, bridges, and pharmaceutical facilities. BBC Verify has corroborated that at least two steel mills and three bridges have been struck, alongside a pharmaceutical plant, causing extensive damage and civilian casualties.
One particularly devastating attack occurred on a bridge under construction in Karaj, resulting in the deaths of at least 13 individuals. Local authorities confirmed that the assault had left a significant gap in the bridge, with construction equipment visible in the aftermath. Following the strikes, Trump shared footage of the destruction, remarking that the bridge would “never be used again” and that further attacks were forthcoming.
Economic Implications for Iran
The strikes have targeted Iran’s critical steel production capabilities, which some experts estimate could result in a loss of up to 70% of the nation’s output. Arman Mahmoudian, a research fellow at the University of South Florida, highlighted that this reduction could impact approximately 20 million tons of steel production, potentially jeopardising 3-3.5% of Iran’s GDP. Such a crippling blow to the steel industry could reverberate across Iran’s economy, which relies heavily on this sector as a cornerstone of its non-oil economic activity.
Moreover, the pharmaceutical sector is under threat as well. On March 31, the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) claimed responsibility for a strike on Tofigh Daru Research & Engineering Company, an essential producer of anaesthetic and cancer medications. While the IDF alleged the firm was involved in developing chemical weapons, independent verification of this claim remains unconfirmed. Still, attacks on pharmaceutical facilities could severely impact access to essential medicines, complicating healthcare for the Iranian populace.
Civilian Casualties and Infrastructure Damage
The consequences of these military actions are stark. Recent bombings have devastated educational institutions, with strikes reported at Shahid Beheshti University and Sharif University of Technology in Tehran, leaving buildings damaged and students at risk. Similarly, a religious site, the Husseinya Mosque in Zanjan, was heavily impacted, resulting in two fatalities and significant destruction to associated facilities.
Reports also highlight strikes on Iranian railways, with the IDF claiming to have destroyed ten key railway components, further complicating civilian travel and transport within the country. A railway worker expressed frustration over the situation, stating, “Everything is falling apart,” encapsulating the sentiments of many affected by these escalating military actions.
Legal and Ethical Concerns Surrounding the Strikes
The legality of these strikes is under scrutiny, with various legal experts and UN officials questioning whether they constitute war crimes. Under international law, targeting civilian infrastructure can only be justified in limited circumstances where it offers a clear military advantage and does not cause excessive civilian harm. Legal scholars have indicated that strikes on essential services such as power and water facilities might be viewed as disproportionate, jeopardising civilian safety and wellbeing.
The UN’s human rights chief has asserted that deliberately attacking civilian structures is a war crime and has called for accountability for those responsible. Despite these warnings, Trump has downplayed concerns regarding potential war crimes, insisting that the true crime lies in allowing Iran to develop nuclear capabilities.
Why it Matters
The ongoing military actions by the US and Israel against Iranian infrastructure not only threaten to destabilise the Iranian economy but also risk exacerbating humanitarian crises within the country. As civilian life becomes increasingly entangled in the geopolitical manoeuvring between these powers, the implications extend beyond immediate military objectives, raising profound ethical questions about the treatment of civilians in conflict. The world watches as the deadline approaches, uncertain of the consequences that may unfold if diplomatic efforts fail.