**
In a striking account of the upheaval within the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), former official Nicholas Enrich has gone public with his experiences during a tumultuous period marked by severe budget cuts and ideological shifts under the Trump administration. Enrich’s new book, *Into the Wood Chipper*, details the chaos that ensued following the administration’s abrupt changes to foreign aid policy, leaving millions of vulnerable people without essential support.
A Historic Commitment Undone
Enrich’s career as a government aid worker began in the wake of a historic $15 billion commitment by then-President George W. Bush in 2003 to combat HIV/AIDS, a pivotal moment in global health. Now, more than two decades later, he reflects on how a new administration can dismantle years of progress in a matter of months. Following Donald Trump’s inauguration in January 2025, USAID faced immediate disruptions, including a temporary halt of funding that swiftly escalated to the elimination of over 80% of its programmes. By July 2025, the agency was formally merged with the State Department, signalling a seismic shift in American foreign policy.
Enrich’s book emerges amidst ongoing discussions about the role of the U.S. in the world, particularly concerning humanitarian aid and alliances. He asserts that the consequences of these cuts have been dire, with reputable organisations like Oxfam estimating that up to 95 million individuals may lose access to basic healthcare services, potentially resulting in over 3 million preventable deaths annually.
The ‘Trade Over Aid’ Doctrine
In tandem with the dismantling of USAID, the State Department initiated a “trade over aid” approach, encouraging countries to foster business relationships rather than rely on American humanitarian assistance. This shift has drawn criticism for prioritising commercial interests over the fundamental needs of impoverished populations. Enrich underscores the cruelty of these policies, noting that while the Trump administration claimed to reduce waste and improve efficiency, the reality was a reckless disregard for the lives affected by these decisions.
In his reflections, Enrich recounts a culture of ignorance and misinformation that permeated the new leadership at USAID. He recalls moments where officials demonstrated a startling lack of understanding of the agency’s core functions, equating foreign aid efforts with purely transactional dealings. This mindset has not only eroded U.S. soft power but has also left a gap that adversaries like Russia and China are eager to fill.
A Call for Accountability and Reform
As Enrich’s narrative unfolds, he emphasises the personal toll that the administration’s policies took on dedicated public servants. With over 10,000 employees at USAID, many felt the impact of a leadership that seemed more interested in dismantling than reforming. Enrich himself faced repercussions for attempting to communicate the risks of foreign aid cuts, including being placed on administrative leave shortly after issuing a memo outlining the potential global consequences.
He illustrates the sense of betrayal felt by many within the agency, who watched as decades of expertise were disregarded in favour of an untested ideology. Enrich’s candid account serves as a reminder of the importance of speaking out against policies that threaten the fabric of humanitarian assistance.
Why it Matters
Enrich’s revelations shed light on the fragility of international aid systems and the profound impact of political ideology on global health and security. As the world grapples with ongoing challenges such as pandemics and humanitarian crises, the dismantling of USAID represents not just a loss of resources but a loss of moral leadership. The decisions made during this period may have long-lasting effects, not only on the populations that depend on U.S. aid but also on America’s standing in the global community. The need for a robust, well-resourced USAID has never been more critical, as the world looks to the U.S. for leadership in addressing pressing global issues.
