**
In a significant fallout from the security vetting controversy surrounding Peter Mandelson’s potential ambassadorship to Washington, Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy has stated that Keir Starmer would have rejected Mandelson’s appointment had he been aware of the failed clearance. The revelation comes as the Labour leader faces mounting pressure following reports that the Foreign Office had disregarded concerns over Mandelson’s vetting status.
Lammy’s Shock and Surprise
Lammy expressed his astonishment upon learning of Mandelson’s security vetting failure, describing the situation as “inexplicable.” This comment marks the first time he has publicly addressed the matter since it erupted into a political scandal. Speaking to the media, Lammy articulated his disbelief that Oliver Robbins, the former senior civil servant recently ousted from the Foreign Office, had kept Downing Street uninformed about the vetting outcome.
The controversy erupted after The Guardian disclosed that the Foreign Office had overruled an initial decision to deny Mandelson security clearance shortly before Starmer publicly announced his appointment. As Starmer prepares for a session in Parliament on Monday, he is tasked with addressing the implications of this debacle on his leadership.
Pressures of a New Administration
During an interview, Lammy admitted that there had been “some time pressures” last January related to Mandelson’s confirmation as ambassador, particularly as Donald Trump was poised to return to the White House. He noted, “There was a feeling that obviously Trump had won the election in November, he was moving into the White House, and it would be good if we had an ambassador.”
This urgency, however, does not absolve the administration from scrutiny. Lammy underscored that neither he nor his advisers had been informed about the vetting process or its conclusions during their tenure at the Foreign Office. Both Starmer and Yvette Cooper, the current Foreign Secretary, echoed these sentiments, asserting their ignorance of the circumstances until recently.
Unpacking the Fallout
As the situation unfolds, Lammy recalled the dramatic moment he was informed about the vetting failure while on a military flight returning from the Middle East. “That obviously felt dramatic and serious and unexpected,” he said, highlighting the gravity of the revelation. He reiterated, “I have never had any official talk to me about vetting, or the detail of vetting.”
Robbins, who received the vetting outcome after Mandelson’s appointment was confirmed, reportedly raised concerns about the reputational risks associated with the appointment. Some insiders suggest that Robbins was adhering strictly to established protocols, while others speculate he may have believed he was acting according to expectations at that time.
Despite the turmoil, Lammy described Robbins as an “outstanding” civil servant, expressing his surprise over the turn of events so early in Robbins’ tenure. “I don’t know what happened in this circumstance. I’m surprised and shocked by it,” he remarked.
Calls for Transparency
In response to the escalating situation, the Foreign Affairs Committee has received correspondence from Cooper, indicating that she has mandated a thorough review of the information provided to the committee regarding Mandelson’s vetting process. Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey has called for immediate transparency, insisting that Starmer must release the initial due diligence report conducted prior to Mandelson’s appointment.
Amidst the political storm, Lammy has acknowledged the potential impact of this controversy on the upcoming local elections, which were already expected to be challenging for Labour. He lamented the timing, stating, “It feels to me like these are tough midterm elections,” emphasising public concerns over the cost of living and service provision.
Why it Matters
The Mandelson vetting scandal not only poses a significant challenge to Keir Starmer’s leadership but also raises critical questions about accountability and transparency within the government. As Labour navigates the fallout, the implications could reverberate through the party’s performance in local elections and beyond, highlighting the need for effective governance and communication in times of crisis. The electorate’s response will be crucial, as it reflects broader concerns about political integrity and the administration’s handling of sensitive appointments.
