**
A plan to establish a detention facility for children and families in Louisiana has raised alarm bells among public health advocates. The proposed site, located at the former England Air Force Base—now known as England Airpark—has been identified as one of the most contaminated with PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) in the United States. High levels of these toxic “forever chemicals” in the groundwater pose serious health risks to vulnerable populations, including children.
The PFAS Crisis at England Airpark
The England Airpark is a sprawling ex-military installation where PFAS levels in the groundwater have been recorded at a staggering 41 million parts per trillion (ppt). For context, federal drinking water standards for certain PFAS compounds are set between 4 and 10 ppt. This alarming discrepancy indicates contamination levels that are over 575,000 times higher than the permissible limits. Although military sites are often plagued by toxic substances, the sheer concentration of PFAS at England Airpark is unprecedented.
In addition to PFAS, the site is also tainted with other hazardous chemicals, including trichloroethylene (TCE) and various volatile organic compounds, alongside concerns about asbestos in the barracks. While officials maintain that the facility draws its drinking water from a separate source, the pervasive nature of these contaminants in the soil and air raises serious questions about the safety of housing families on this site.
A Dangerous Proposal
The US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency has announced plans for a “first of its kind” short-term detention centre for migrant families and unaccompanied children at this contaminated location. Officials stated that the facility would accommodate groups for a duration of three to five days, with a specific focus on those choosing to “self-deport.” However, immigrant rights advocates argue that the voluntary nature of this programme is misleading, with many participants feeling coerced into compliance.
The proposed centre would be situated adjacent to an active runway, where families would be processed for deportation. Critics of the plan, including Jared Hayes, a senior policy analyst with the Environmental Working Group, have highlighted the inherent dangers of placing families in such an environment. “There shouldn’t be housing at contaminated bases, and we need to be cleaning up this stuff much faster if we’re going to put people in harm’s way,” Hayes stated firmly.
Environmental and Health Risks
PFAS are a class of over 16,000 synthetic chemicals known for their widespread use in products that resist water, stains, and heat. Dubbed “forever chemicals,” they are infamous for their persistence in the environment and their association with serious health issues, including cancer, liver damage, immune disorders, and developmental problems in children.
The contamination at England Airpark is particularly concerning because PFAS were historically used in firefighting foam employed during military training exercises. This foam leached into the groundwater, exacerbating an already critical situation. Moreover, the military’s historical use of burn pits at the site—incinerating a wide range of materials, including toxic waste—has further contributed to environmental degradation.
Children are particularly susceptible to the adverse health effects of these chemicals, as their smaller bodies absorb toxins more readily. Public health advocates are deeply concerned about the potential for long-term health implications for families residing at the proposed facility. “The risk for people living on site is in the dust and in the air, and we don’t know what levels are in the dust,” Hayes added, emphasising the urgent need for thorough testing of the air and soil.
Legal Quagmire and Community Resistance
Community advocates are raising questions about the legality and ethics of establishing a detention centre on a site designated for industrial use. Frances Kelly, a representative from Louisiana Advocates for Immigrants in Detention, pointed out that residential land requires stricter cleanup standards than those currently in place at England Airpark. “It’s troubling to think that families will be living in such a polluted environment,” she said.
Despite claims that the PFAS pollution is not present on the barracks site, there is no clear evidence that comprehensive testing has been conducted. Hayes noted that federal records do not indicate any active cleanup efforts, with the military still in the preliminary stages of mapping the PFAS plume. The lack of immediate action raises concerns that the plume is merely spreading, leading to further contamination.
Although it remains uncertain whether any legal recourse can be pursued to halt the project, advocates continue to push back against the plan. “There’s always a way to undo it,” Kelly asserted, embodying the resolve of those fighting for the health and safety of impacted families.
Why it Matters
The establishment of a detention facility for children and families at a highly contaminated military site raises profound ethical questions about the treatment of vulnerable populations in the United States. By placing families at risk of exposure to dangerous chemicals, the government not only jeopardises their health and well-being but also underscores a troubling disregard for human rights. It is imperative that we advocate for the protection of immigrant families and demand accountability for environmental injustices that threaten their lives. The situation at England Airpark is a stark reminder of the intersection of immigration policy and public health, and it calls for urgent action and reform.
