**
As the United States braces for another hurricane season and the potential for record-breaking heat, experts are increasingly alarmed by the Trump administration’s budget reductions to essential climate and weather data programmes. These cuts threaten to undermine the reliability of federal weather forecasts, which are critical during extreme weather events.
AI Technology Meets Budget Cuts
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) recently introduced a suite of artificial intelligence-driven global weather forecasting models, claiming that these tools would enhance the “speed, efficiency, and accuracy” of predictions. A NOAA official stated in March that these AI models are being trained using extensive historical weather data spanning centuries. However, leading experts caution that while AI can significantly aid in weather prediction, its effectiveness is heavily reliant on the availability of comprehensive data.
Monica Medina, former principal deputy undersecretary of commerce for oceans and atmosphere, highlighted the contradiction in the current approach. “We absolutely need AI to help us process the increasing volumes of data,” she said. “But right now, we’re reducing the very data collection that’s essential for training these models. This is a step in the wrong direction.”
Despite the agency’s reassurances about the robust data collection efforts—utilising satellites, weather balloons, and ground-based sensors—reports indicate that staffing cuts have severely limited NOAA’s ability to maintain critical satellite operations and balloon launches, which are vital components of the nation’s data-gathering framework. The reduction in climate research funding threatens not just the observation systems but also the researchers who analyze these data to understand climate impacts.
The Impact of Reduced Climate Research
Craig McLean, NOAA’s former acting chief scientist, warned that cuts to climate research directly affect the accuracy of weather forecasts. “Weather times time equals climate,” he noted. “When we cut climate research, we halt progress in weather prediction.” These challenges come at a time when the U.S. is likely facing increasingly extreme weather patterns, with a “super El Niño” expected to raise temperatures and potentially increase hurricane activity.
In light of these concerns, NOAA is set to release its forecast for the 2026 Atlantic hurricane season on Thursday, a report that many are watching closely as the country prepares for what could be an unprecedented summer.
AI Models: Limitations and Risks
For decades, meteorologists relied on traditional physics-based models to predict weather conditions, employing complex mathematical equations to simulate atmospheric dynamics. The new AI-based models, however, focus on identifying patterns within historical data rather than directly simulating atmospheric processes. While these models require less computational power and have shown promise in certain forecasting aspects, experts point out significant shortcomings, particularly in predicting extreme weather events.
A recent study published in *Science Advances* revealed that AI models struggle to accurately forecast unprecedented weather scenarios, often reverting to predictions based on past events that may no longer be relevant. Sebastian Engelke, a co-author of the study, explained that traditional models are designed to adapt to new conditions, whereas AI models can falter when faced with novel weather patterns.
Chris Gloninger, a forensic meteorologist who has faced backlash for discussing the climate crisis publicly, drew parallels between flawed AI models and outdated infrastructure designed for a static climate. “The AI weather models were trained on a climate that no longer exists,” he asserted, emphasising the need for robust data collection to support accurate weather forecasting.
The Future of Weather Forecasting
Despite NOAA’s integration of AI into its forecasting models, concerns persist that scaling back data collection while increasing reliance on AI technology could compromise the quality of federal forecasts. Gloninger warned of a “snowball effect,” whereby reduced data availability leads to less reliable predictions.
Neil Jacobs, NOAA’s current administrator and a noted modelling scientist, is under scrutiny for his alignment with the Trump administration’s budget decisions. While Jacobs is committed to advancing weather forecasting techniques, he must navigate the pressures of adhering to cuts that many see as detrimental to the agency’s mission.
Weather forecasts are not merely academic exercises; they are vital tools for ensuring public safety, enabling timely disaster warnings, and facilitating operations across various sectors, including agriculture and energy. Medina emphasised the implications of compromised forecasting: “Inaccurate weather predictions could endanger lives and disrupt the economy.”
Why it Matters
The ongoing cuts to climate data collection and research threaten not only the reliability of weather forecasts but also the safety and well-being of millions of Americans. As the climate crisis intensifies and extreme weather events become more frequent, the need for accurate and comprehensive weather predictions has never been more critical. The current trajectory raises urgent questions about how we can ensure effective responses to the increasingly volatile climate that lies ahead.
