**
In a stark assessment of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) response to the ongoing Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Uganda, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has voiced concerns over the agency’s timing in identifying and acting upon the crisis. His remarks, made during a press briefing in Rome, come as the United States grapples with significant reductions in public health funding, raising alarms about the nation’s preparedness for infectious disease threats.
WHO’s Response Under Scrutiny
During the press conference on 19 May 2026, Rubio stated, “The lead is obviously going to be CDC (the Centers for Disease Control) and the World Health Organization, which was a little late to identify this thing unfortunately.” His comments reflect broader apprehensions regarding the WHO’s handling of emerging health threats, particularly in light of the recent Ebola outbreak that has claimed approximately 131 lives in the DRC.
The criticism follows former President Donald Trump’s controversial withdrawal of the US from the WHO, a decision labelled by experts as potentially detrimental to global health security. This departure, which occurred shortly after Trump returned to office last year, resulted in a significant loss of personnel, with around 2,000 jobs cut from the WHO’s total staff of 9,400.
US Commitment to Address Ebola Crisis
Despite these challenges, the US government has pledged approximately $13 million in aid aimed at establishing 50 clinics to treat Ebola patients in the DRC. Rubio acknowledged the logistical difficulties in accessing rural areas plagued by conflict, stating, “It’s a little tough to get to because it’s in a rural area … and [a] hard-to-get-to place in a war-torn country, unfortunately. We’re going to lean into that pretty heavy.”
The WHO has classified the Ebola outbreak as a “public health emergency of international concern,” highlighting the urgent need for coordinated international efforts to combat the spread of the virus. The organisation has expressed concerns about the potential for further transmission, particularly in neighbouring countries, and has urged nations not to impose travel or trade restrictions that could exacerbate the situation.
Experts Warn of Consequences of Cuts to Public Health
Public health experts have been quick to counter Rubio’s criticisms of the WHO, arguing that the organisation operates under significant constraints and in challenging environments. Gigi Gronvall, an immunologist from Johns Hopkins University, stated, “Blaming the WHO is misplaced, because they are operating with limited resources in a difficult setting with many security challenges.” She further cautioned that the cuts to US public health resources could leave the country ill-equipped to handle future outbreaks, stating, “It is a strategic mistake – and a national security vulnerability – that we are worse off now to handle infectious disease threats than at the start of Covid-19.”
Jennifer Nuzzo, an epidemiology professor at Brown University, echoed these concerns, noting a shift in the US government’s role in managing outbreaks. “It feels like the US government is on the sidelines this time,” she remarked, reflecting the decreased presence and influence of American health agencies in global health matters.
The Broader Implications of Public Health Funding Cuts
As the US faces an unprecedented wave of layoffs across key health agencies, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the ramifications for public health preparedness are becoming increasingly apparent. The Department of Health and Human Services recently announced plans to eliminate numerous positions as part of a broader strategy to reduce the agency’s workforce by 10,000.
These cuts come at a time when the risk of infectious diseases remains a pressing concern, with experts warning that the erosion of public health infrastructure could hinder the nation’s ability to respond effectively to future health crises. The recent hantavirus outbreak, although not expected to escalate into a global health emergency, has highlighted the vulnerabilities within the US public health system.
Why it Matters
The ongoing dialogue surrounding the Ebola outbreak underscores a critical moment for US public health policy. As the country grapples with the consequences of significant funding cuts and a diminished global health presence, the implications for national security and public health readiness are profound. Ensuring robust funding and support for public health initiatives is essential not only for managing current health threats but also for safeguarding against future pandemics. The ability to respond efficiently to infectious disease outbreaks is a cornerstone of national security, emphasising the need for renewed investment in public health infrastructure and international cooperation.
