**
In a recent move that has heightened tensions in the Canada-U.S. defence relationship, Prime Minister Mark Carney has responded to the Trump administration’s decision to suspend the long-standing Permanent Joint Board on Defence. This 86-year-old institution, designed to facilitate military cooperation between the two nations, has been put on hold following accusations from U.S. officials that Canada has not met its military obligations. Carney, however, asserts that Canada is making significant strides in defence spending, contrary to claims from Washington.
Suspension of a Historic Defence Body
On Monday, Elbridge Colby, Under Secretary of Defence for Policy, announced the suspension of the Permanent Joint Board on Defence, citing a lack of credible progress from Canada in fulfilling its military commitments. Colby’s remarks came as part of a broader critique of NATO allies, particularly aimed at those perceived to be under-contributing to their own defence. He stated, “Unfortunately, Canada has failed to make credible progress on its defence commitments,” justifying the “pause” in the joint board’s activities.
During a separate announcement regarding a resource project in Quebec, Prime Minister Carney downplayed the significance of the board’s suspension, noting it had not convened since 2024. “It has a long heritage, but I wouldn’t overplay the importance of this,” he told reporters, emphasising that Canada has substantially increased its defence budget over the past year.
Defence Spending on the Rise
Carney highlighted that Canada has committed over $80 billion in new military spending over the next five years, surpassing NATO’s goal of allocating 2 per cent of GDP to defence. “This is the first time since the fall of the Berlin Wall that Canada has reached its NATO defence spending target,” he remarked, asserting that Canada is indeed taking its defence responsibilities seriously.
The Prime Minister also mentioned ongoing plans to elevate defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP, although he refrained from providing specific details, calling it premature. He pointed out that Canada is investing significantly in the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) to modernise its capabilities over a 20-year timeframe.
Diversifying Defence Partnerships
In light of the changing geopolitical landscape, Carney asserted that Canada would diversify its defence partnerships beyond the United States. He cited Canada’s commitment to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and its robust support for Ukraine amid ongoing conflict with Russia. “Ukraine is going to triumph, and we’re going to be on the right side of history,” he declared, signalling a shift towards broader international cooperation.
John McKay, a former Liberal MP who chaired the joint board for seven years, highlighted that the board served as a platform for identifying growing tensions in the Canada-U.S. defence relationship. He speculated that the Trump administration’s irritation with Canada’s strengthening ties to other allies and its reconsideration of acquiring U.S.-made F-35 jets may have contributed to the suspension of the joint board.
The Implications of Rhetoric and Reality
David Perry, president of the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, described Canada’s participation in the board as a largely performative exercise that had lost its effectiveness. Colby’s announcement also targeted Carney’s earlier statements at the World Economic Forum in Davos, which were perceived as critical of the Trump administration. The U.S. official stressed that Canada must align its rhetoric with tangible defence commitments.
In a related context, U.S. Vice-President JD Vance reiterated long-standing grievances about NATO allies relying too heavily on American military support. He noted that European countries ought to take greater responsibility for their own security, reinforcing the administration’s push for increased defence contributions from allies.
Future Challenges Ahead
While Canada has achieved the NATO target of 2 per cent of GDP for defence spending, Prime Minister Carney has yet to articulate a concrete strategy for meeting the new target of 5 per cent by 2035. This ambitious goal is comprised of two components: raising core military spending to 3.5 per cent and allocating 1.5 per cent towards dual-use infrastructure.
The Canadian government has indicated that the infrastructure target is achievable based on existing spending plans. However, the Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer has flagged a lack of clarity regarding the execution of these heightened NATO commitments.
Carney defended the government’s cautious approach, stating that it would be imprudent to rush into a detailed plan that may not adequately address the evolving nature of warfare. He underscored that the conflict in Ukraine is fundamentally altering defence strategies, as new technologies, such as drones and artificial intelligence, reshape military engagements.
Why it Matters
The suspension of the Permanent Joint Board on Defence signals a significant moment in Canada-U.S. relations, particularly in the context of defence cooperation. As Canada strives to enhance its military capabilities and diversify its international alliances, the government’s challenge will be to balance these ambitions with the demands of its traditional partner, the United States. With the geopolitical landscape evolving rapidly, the future of defence spending and cooperation will be crucial for ensuring national security and maintaining strong international relationships.
