**
The U.S. Department of Justice has reportedly initiated a criminal investigation into E Jean Carroll, the author who secured a $5 million verdict against Donald Trump in 2023. The federal jury found that Trump had sexually abused her in 1996 and subsequently defamed her when he denied the allegations in 2022. This investigation is centred on potential perjury claims regarding Carroll’s testimony in her civil lawsuits against Trump, specifically concerning the funding of her legal fees.
Investigation Focuses on Alleged Perjury
Sources familiar with the matter have indicated that prosecutors are examining whether Carroll provided false information during her depositions in two civil cases. The first lawsuit addressed the alleged sexual assault in a department store dressing room, while the second focused on defamation arising from Trump’s denials. The crux of the inquiry relates to Carroll’s assertion in a 2022 deposition that she had not received any external financial assistance for her legal battle.
However, it was revealed shortly before the trial commenced that a nonprofit organisation, financed by Reid Hoffman, the billionaire LinkedIn co-founder, had indeed contributed to some of Carroll’s legal expenses. Carroll’s legal team clarified that she had no direct communication with the nonprofit, leading to a second deposition where Trump’s attorney, Alina Habba, was permitted to question Carroll further.
Background on the Civil Case and Damages
In a landmark ruling, a jury awarded Carroll millions in damages, a decision Trump is currently appealing. He is contesting not only the $5 million awarded in the sexual abuse case but also an additional $83 million related to the defamation suit. Trump has consistently sought to overturn these financial penalties.
On 30 December 2024, a three-judge panel from the federal appeals court in New York dismissed claims that Carroll had lied during her deposition. The judges noted that Carroll had plausibly forgotten about the limited external funding her legal team had received, concluding that she had not discussed this matter with her attorneys for over two years prior to her deposition in October 2022. The court maintained that Carroll’s lack of knowledge about the funding source was genuine.
Legal Implications and Ongoing Inquiries
The investigation led by Andrew Boutros, the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, has raised eyebrows, especially since Boutros was appointed by Trump himself. Todd Blanche, the acting Attorney General who represented Trump in Carroll’s case, has recused himself from the ongoing inquiry, further complicating the legal landscape.
Compounding the situation, Boutros is currently facing scrutiny after allegations emerged regarding potential misconduct in a separate case involving an anti-ICE protester. These developments may not only affect the trajectory of Carroll’s situation but could also have broader implications for the Justice Department’s handling of politically sensitive cases.
Why it Matters
This investigation into E Jean Carroll underscores the complexities of legal accountability in high-profile cases, particularly when intertwined with political figures. As the Justice Department navigates these murky waters, the implications could resonate far beyond Carroll and Trump. The pursuit of justice, the integrity of the legal process, and the broader societal conversation surrounding sexual abuse and accountability remain at the forefront of public attention. The outcome of this inquiry will likely influence perceptions of the legal system’s ability to address claims against powerful individuals and could set precedents for future cases involving similar allegations.
