**
The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) has taken an important step by referring five individuals serving Indeterminate Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences to the Court of Appeal. This move highlights ongoing concerns regarding the controversial sentencing practice, which, despite being abolished in 2012, continues to affect approximately 2,800 inmates. The cases stem from a period between 2002 and 2010, raising questions about the suitability of such sentences for young offenders.
Understanding IPP Sentences
IPP sentences were introduced in 2005 as a means to keep potentially dangerous individuals in custody beyond the usual prison terms. However, these sentences were met with significant criticism due to their indefinite nature and the psychological toll they take on those imprisoned. Originally intended for offenders whose crimes did not justify a life sentence, the sentences have left many in a state of uncertainty and despair, with a lack of clarity regarding their release prospects.
A spokesperson for the Ministry of Justice expressed support for the abolition of IPP sentences, stating, “It is right that IPP sentences were abolished and we have already taken action to support these offenders to move on with their lives.” The ministry has also indicated that legislative changes aim to facilitate a faster review process for those serving IPP sentences in the community, allowing for more timely consideration of licence termination.
The Cases in Question
Dame Veira Baird, the interim Chair of the CCRC, discussed the five men whose cases have been referred. All were sentenced in their late teens and have remained in custody since. “They’ve let three lads out on similar appeals at similar ages,” she noted, suggesting that these cases might align with recent shifts in the Court of Appeal’s perspective on IPP sentences. Dame Baird emphasised that the court appears to recognise the fundamental differences between young offenders and mature individuals, a critical consideration in the context of rehabilitation.
Matthew Booth, now 34, is one of the individuals affected by the IPP system. He received his sentence at the age of 15 for wounding with intent and unlawful wounding. After serving over six years, he faced multiple recalls due to breaches of his licence conditions, including being in an undisclosed relationship. “I don’t think any child should get IPP because what you go through,” Booth reflected. “You’re just feeling like there’s no help. There’s no hope. It just takes a toll on you. It changes you.”
The Psychological Impact of IPP Sentences
The psychological ramifications of IPP sentences are stark, as echoed by both Booth and Dame Baird. “These are sentences which just bring people into hopelessness,” Dame Baird remarked. The CCRC’s action to refer these cases may signal a growing recognition of the need for reform in how the justice system handles young offenders and the psychological burdens placed upon them.
The conversation surrounding IPP sentences reflects broader themes in prison reform, with advocates calling for systems that prioritise rehabilitation over punishment. As public awareness of the consequences of such sentences grows, the potential for change becomes increasingly tangible.
Why it Matters
The referral of these five IPP prisoners to the Court of Appeal is a pivotal moment in the ongoing discourse about the treatment of young offenders within the British justice system. It raises essential questions about the adequacy of current sentencing practices and the psychological well-being of those imprisoned under indefinite terms. As society grapples with the implications of such sentences, the outcomes of these appeals may pave the way for significant reforms, potentially altering the lives of many still affected by the remnants of a system designed to protect the public yet fraught with challenges that hinder rehabilitation and foster despair.
