**
In a historic move, residents of Monterey Park, California, have made headlines as they cast their votes in favour of a permanent ban on data centres, marking a significant shift in local governance. The ballot initiative, which resulted in a resounding majority, signifies the first time a city in the United States has allowed its citizens to directly decide on the construction of these facilities. With over 86% of the counted votes supporting the ban, local officials and activists are optimistic that this decision will inspire similar actions in communities across the nation.
A Landmark Decision in Local Governance
On 21 January, the residents of Monterey Park took to the polls to express their sentiments regarding the construction of a data centre proposed by HMC StratCap, an investment firm. The project, which was set to encompass nearly 250,000 square feet, faced mounting opposition from locals concerned about environmental issues, rising utility costs, and the impact of such developments on residential areas.
The ballot measure required a simple majority to pass, and as of the early hours following the vote, results indicated that 86.3% of the 7,000 votes counted thus far were in favour of the ban. City Council member Jose Sanchez heralded this outcome as a “landslide victory,” affirming that the people of Monterey Park have decisively stated their preference against data centres in their community. “This shows unequivocally that residents in Monterey Park do not want data centres in their community,” Sanchez remarked, encouraging other municipalities to follow suit.
The Context of Local Opposition
Prior to the ballot initiative, Monterey Park’s city council had implemented an indefinite moratorium on data centre construction in April, reflecting a growing discontent regarding the proposed project. Residents raised alarms about potential environmental degradation and the strain on local resources, prompting the council’s action. The firm HMC StratCap had previously threatened legal action in response to the moratorium, but with the overwhelming support for the ban, the company has indicated it will not pursue litigation.
The measure’s language explicitly states the intention to safeguard air quality, protect drinking water, and mitigate potential increases in electricity and water rates. This proactive approach aims to ensure that the ban remains in effect until such time as voters decide otherwise.
A National Movement Against Data Centres
Monterey Park’s initiative is part of a broader trend observed across the United States, where communities are increasingly mobilising against the rise of data centres, particularly those associated with artificial intelligence. A recent Gallup poll revealed that approximately 70% of Americans are opposed to the construction of AI data centres in their neighbourhoods.
While other municipalities, such as Port Washington in Wisconsin and Augusta Township in Michigan, are also considering similar measures, Monterey Park stands out for having directly empowered its residents through a ballot initiative. The Data Center Coalition, which advocates for the expansion of these facilities, has expressed concern that such bans could deter economic investment and job creation in local areas, arguing that residents deserve the opportunity to compete for jobs and tax revenues.
Grassroots Activism Fuels Change
Local activists played a crucial role in shaping the outcome of the vote, with organisations like San Gabriel Valley Progressive Action leading the charge. Co-founder Amy J Wong noted that the city council showed a willingness to listen to community concerns, which is not always the case in local governance. “They recognised how many residents were angry, and if they moved forward with the data centre, they could possibly be voted out,” Wong explained.
With limited time to campaign—just two months—activists produced 10,000 flyers and multilingual mailers to ensure residents understood the implications of the vote. Wong underscored the necessity of educating voters about the ballot’s wording, as confusion over whether a “yes” or “no” vote would affirm the ban was common among residents.
Why it Matters
Monterey Park’s decisive action represents a powerful statement about community agency in the face of corporate development. By embracing direct democracy, residents have not only influenced local policy but have also set a precedent that could resonate throughout the nation. As concerns about the environmental and social impacts of data centres grow, the successful ban in Monterey Park may inspire similar movements, prompting a reevaluation of the balance between technological development and community wellbeing across the United States.
