**
In a significant gathering in Accra, Ghana, a coalition of African lawmakers has advanced a controversial draft charter that prioritises traditional family values at the expense of established human rights norms. The proposed document, which asserts that sexual and reproductive health rights pose a threat to the African family unit, has sparked widespread condemnation from human rights advocates and legal experts across the continent.
Draft Charter’s Contentions
The draft African Charter on Family, Sovereignty, and Values, unveiled during an inter-parliamentary conference, challenges numerous international human rights commitments. It contends that foreign ideologies are undermining African culture and urges nations to withdraw from agreements inconsistent with its principles, notably the 2003 Maputo Protocol, which upholds gender equality and the reproductive rights of women and girls.
This charter marks a decisive shift towards a legal framework that prioritises a moralistic approach over a rights-based perspective. It falsely claims that policies promoting sexual and reproductive health inherently encourage unrestricted abortion and rejects comprehensive sex education (CSE), labelling it as detrimental to children. The document further asserts a rigid binary view of gender and posits that parental rights should override those of children, particularly concerning matters of sexuality and discipline.
Criticism from Experts and Advocates
Various human rights organisations have denounced the charter as regressive and perilous. Gilbert Mitullah, a prominent Kenyan lawyer and board member of the Queer African Network, expressed concern that this charter effectively serves as a mechanism to dismantle existing commitments to sexual and reproductive health rights and LGBTQ+ protections. He stated, “It is a licence to oppose, regress on or refuse to implement existing commitments on sexual and reproductive health, and on LGBTQ rights.”
The charter was primarily drafted by a group of lawmakers led by Ugandan officials during the annual inter-parliamentary conference, which has become notorious for its stance on anti-LGBTQ+ legislation. The aim of this year’s conference was to generate sufficient support for the charter to present it to the African Union’s general assembly in February 2027 for a vote.
Critics argue that the document’s narrow definition of family—centred exclusively on heterosexual marriage—overlooks the rich diversity of familial structures across Africa’s 54 nations. The Initiative for Strategic Litigation in Africa (ISLA) describes this emphasis on family over individual rights as a potential endorsement of the subjugation of women and children, thereby insulating private family dynamics from necessary state intervention in situations of violence or discrimination.
The Influence of External Forces
The charter’s language has been scrutinised for its alignment with the agendas of conservative Christian organisations from both the United States and Europe, which oppose reproductive rights and LGBTQ+ equality. Famia Nkansa, communications lead at Purposeful, a Sierra Leone-based organisation advocating for girls’ activism, articulated that the anti-rights movement in Africa mirrors colonial tactics, positioning the continent as a battleground for ideological conflicts between the West and local populations.
Mitullah highlighted the origins of the charter, noting its connections to a transnational network of anti-rights groups. He asserted that the document is not an authentic African initiative but rather a “transplant” of foreign ideologies seeking to disguise themselves as indigenous. Notably, the text references the Geneva Consensus Declaration, a manifesto against abortion, suggesting that it is part of a broader strategy to undermine established rights frameworks in Africa.
The Response from Supporters
In response to the criticism, Family Watch International (FWI), an Arizona-based Christian lobbying group, distanced itself from the conference while voicing its support for the charter’s restrictions on CSE and its advocacy for family-focused legislation. FWI emphasised that the draft charter is “Africa-inspired, African-initiated, and African-directed and controlled,” despite acknowledging its alignment with their ideological perspectives.
Why it Matters
The advancement of this charter signifies a pivotal moment for human rights in Africa, potentially eroding decades of progress in gender equality, sexual health, and LGBTQ+ rights. As nations grapple with the implications of this draft, the outcome could set a precedent for the future of individual freedoms and the protection of vulnerable groups across the continent. The international community will be watching closely, as the balance between traditional values and human rights hangs in the balance.
