**
The Canadian government is poised to amend the Online Streaming Act, a move that has prompted significant concern among domestic broadcasters. As Ottawa contemplates eliminating mandatory contributions from foreign streaming platforms aimed at bolstering Canadian news and cultural industries, industry leaders argue that such a decision would undermine the nation’s media landscape.
Government’s Shift in Policy
Reports indicate that Ottawa plans to instruct the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) to relax certain obligations that compel international streaming services to financially support local news and niche broadcasters. This decision is believed to be a response to pressure from U.S. streaming giants concerned about the potential impacts of the legislation on their operations. Two senior government sources shared insights with The Globe and Mail, revealing that negotiations are set to commence with foreign streamers and other stakeholders to establish what they consider to be a “more reasonable rate” of contribution to Canadian programming.
The Online Streaming Act, enacted in 2023, initially mandated these foreign platforms to contribute to Canada’s cultural sectors. However, the anticipated rollback has raised alarms within the broadcasting community, which fears a detrimental effect on local news production and the overall media ecosystem.
Industry Reactions
Kevin Desjardins, president of the Canadian Association of Broadcasters, has been vocal about the need for foreign streamers to maintain their financial commitments to Canadian content. He noted that while traditional broadcasters relied on a cross-subsidy model—where entertainment content funded news production—foreign platforms have disrupted this balance.
“If they do not produce news themselves, they should support it through contributions to funds,” Desjardins stated, underscoring the necessity of these contributions in maintaining a robust news environment. Despite the government’s apparent pivot, he expressed concern that the current trajectory does not align with their advocacy for equal treatment of broadcasters and streaming platforms.
David Errington, president of Accessible Media Inc., echoed these sentiments, asserting that foreign streamers ought to contribute to the Canadian broadcasting framework, as is customary in many other nations. Previously, AMI was set to benefit from increased contributions mandated by the CRTC, which would have raised the required funding from 5 per cent to 15 per cent of the streamers’ Canadian revenues.
Yet, with the government’s recent directive to reassess the CRTC’s policy, there are fears that such vital funding mechanisms will be compromised.
Government Funding Initiatives
In tandem with the discussions surrounding the Online Streaming Act, Ottawa has announced a substantial $600-million support package aimed at revitalising Canada’s media sector. This financial injection comes as the government acknowledges the legal challenges that have stalled contributions from foreign streamers. The new funding initiative is expected to fill the gaps left by foreign contributions, particularly for local news and broadcasters that would otherwise suffer from the potential withdrawal of financial support.
These subsidies, also earmarked for services of exceptional importance—including the Aboriginal Peoples Television Network (APTN)—aim to ensure long-term viability for Canadian media outlets, independent of the fluctuating revenues from international streaming services. Errington emphasised the critical nature of this support, stating, “If we didn’t get this help, in three or four years from now we would probably be out of business.”
Broader Implications and Future Outlook
Reynolds Mastin, president and CEO of the Canadian Media Producers Association, has called for the federal government to remain steadfast in defending the integrity of the Online Streaming Act. He articulated the necessity for foreign services operating within Canada to finance Canadian-produced content that showcases local talent—a sentiment echoed by many in the industry.
As the government prepares to issue new policy directives, the implications of these changes could reshape Canada’s cultural landscape. Melissa Eckersley from Corus Entertainment highlighted the urgency for a level playing field between local broadcasters and their foreign counterparts, insisting that robust support for independent local news is more crucial than ever.
On the other hand, Graham Davies, head of the Digital Media Association, welcomed the government’s shift towards direct support for creators, suggesting that such an approach is preferable to imposing a streaming tax. This perspective aligns with the broader concerns voiced by U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, who has critiqued the Online Streaming Act for its perceived bias against American tech firms.
Why it Matters
The forthcoming adjustments to the Online Streaming Act could have profound ramifications for Canada’s media landscape, particularly in regard to the sustainability of local news and cultural content. As the government navigates the delicate balance between supporting domestic industries and appeasing international stakeholders, the outcomes will significantly influence both the future of Canadian broadcasting and the representation of Canadian voices in the digital age. The discussions ahead will be pivotal—not just for the financial health of media entities, but for the cultural fabric of the nation itself.
