Major Banks Continue to Fund Fossil Fuels, Undermining Climate Goals

Chloe Whitmore, US Climate Correspondent
5 Min Read
⏱️ 4 min read

**

In a troubling development for climate advocates, a recent report reveals that the world’s leading financial institutions have injected a staggering $906 billion into the fossil fuel sector in the past year. This marks an “unfathomable” increase in funding that contradicts global efforts to mitigate climate change, as prominent banks such as JPMorgan Chase solidify their roles as major financiers of coal, oil, and gas. The findings are a wake-up call for activists and policymakers alike, highlighting the urgent need for accountability in the financial sector.

A Surge in Fossil Fuel Financing

The annual “Banking on Climate Chaos” report, compiled by a coalition of environmental organisations, indicates that funding for fossil fuels among the 65 largest banks rose by nearly 8%—an increase of $64 billion compared to the previous year. This alarming trend signals a departure from the commitments made under the Paris Agreement, where countries pledged to limit global warming to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. Despite this, fossil fuel financing remains robust, with JPMorgan Chase leading the pack, having allocated $58 billion to the sector, a 13% rise from 2024.

“This past year was supposed to be a turning point, a moment where we could start reversing the trend of fossil fuel funding,” said Caleb Schwartz, a policy analyst with the Rainforest Action Network, which contributed to the report. “Instead, we’re seeing a continuous increase, and that’s deeply concerning.”

The Role of Major Players

The report highlights that the concentration of fossil fuel financing is becoming increasingly centralised among a handful of large banks. Known as the “dirty dozen,” these institutions are responsible for 40% of all funding directed towards fossil fuels. Notably, Bank of America follows JPMorgan Chase in the ranks, with Japanese banks MUFG and Mizuho Financial also making significant contributions. Barclays stands out as the highest-ranking British bank, taking the eighth spot in the list of top financiers.

Amidst rising geopolitical tensions and escalating oil prices, major fossil fuel companies have reported soaring profits, suggesting that the industry is not only surviving but thriving. “The fossil fuel incumbents are not going out with a whimper,” remarked Niko Lusiani, a climate and energy expert who edited this year’s report. “They are doubling down to expand an increasingly fragile, unreliable, risky energy system.”

A Broken Promise

Despite previous pledges to reduce emissions and limit funding to the dirtiest energy sources, many banks have retreated from their commitments. The disbanding of the Net-Zero Banking Alliance—an initiative aimed at aligning banking practices with net-zero emissions targets by 2050—illustrates the growing disconnect between rhetoric and action. As political pressures mount, especially in the United States, banks appear to be prioritising short-term gains over long-term sustainability.

“The era of voluntary commitments has not worked at the scale that we need,” Lusiani stated. He emphasised the necessity for more stringent regulatory measures from financial regulators and policymakers, particularly in major financial centres.

In response to the mounting scrutiny, spokespeople from Bank of America and Citigroup have defended their positions. Bank of America reiterated its support for a diverse range of energy clients, while Citigroup reaffirmed its commitment to achieving net-zero financed emissions by 2050, balancing this with the need for reliable energy solutions.

The Path Forward

As the climate crisis accelerates, the contradiction between financial practices and environmental commitments becomes increasingly untenable. The report underscores the urgent need for banks to align their funding strategies with the goals of the Paris Agreement. Without significant changes in how financial institutions operate, the world risks surpassing critical climate thresholds, leading to catastrophic consequences.

Why it Matters

The financial sector holds immense power in shaping the future of our planet. By continuing to funnel billions into fossil fuels, banks are not merely funding industries; they are endorsing a destructive status quo that threatens global stability and environmental health. As climate activists rally for change, the onus is on both the financial institutions and policymakers to pivot towards sustainable practices. Failing to do so will not only jeopardise our climate goals but also the very future of life on Earth as we know it.

Share This Article
Chloe Whitmore reports on the environmental crises and climate policy shifts across the United States. From the frontlines of wildfires in the West to the legislative battles in D.C., Chloe provides in-depth analysis of America's transition to renewable energy. She holds a degree in Environmental Science from Yale and was previously a climate reporter for The Atlantic.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2026 The Update Desk. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy