New Research Links Smacking to Poor Academic Performance and Risky Behaviour in Children

Hannah Clarke, Social Affairs Correspondent
5 Min Read
⏱️ 4 min read

A recent study has unveiled troubling evidence that smacking children as a form of punishment may detrimentally affect their academic performance and increase the likelihood of engaging in risky behaviours during adolescence. Conducted by researchers at University College London (UCL), the investigation surveyed nearly 19,000 children born in the UK between 2000 and 2002, revealing that smacking does not yield positive outcomes for children.

Findings from the Study

The research team, led by Associate Professor Anja Heilmann, examined the effects of physical punishment on children at various developmental stages—specifically ages three, five, and seven. Their analysis revealed that smacking “does no good whatsoever” and is associated with harmful consequences. Alarmingly, the study found that children who were smacked were 5.7 percentage points more likely to fail to achieve five GCSE passes, including essential subjects like English and Maths.

Furthermore, the study indicated that adolescents who experienced physical punishment in early childhood were 33% more prone to engage in risky behaviours, such as bullying. This correlation raises significant concerns about the long-term impact of smacking on children’s development and well-being.

Call for Legislative Change

In light of these findings, campaigners are urging England and Northern Ireland to follow the lead of Scotland and Wales, where smacking has been made illegal. While the Department for Education in England has stated that there are currently no plans to amend existing laws, it emphasised that the safety and well-being of children remain a top priority.

Heilmann expressed hope that smacking will be abolished in the UK, advocating for children to receive the same protections against physical assault that adults enjoy. “My hope is that smacking stops in the UK so children have the same protection from physical assault that adults have,” she stated.

Perspectives on Parenting Strategies

While the UCL study presents compelling evidence against smacking, opinions on the issue remain divided. Some researchers, like Professor Ellie Lee from the University of Kent, caution against oversimplifying the complexities of child development. Lee, who supports the Be Reasonable England campaign advocating for the acceptance of smacking, argued that boundaries are necessary for children to learn societal norms.

“It would be great if we could just be nice to children and think they would just be nice back,” she noted. “The reality is that we have to have boundaries, and boundaries have to be backed up.”

Conversely, advocates for a ban on smacking highlight the need for nurturing and positive parenting approaches. Amy Woods, owner of Baby College in Salford, expressed disbelief that smacking is still permissible in England. “Children need warmth, they need responsive relationships, and they need play to thrive, definitely not violence at a young age,” she stated.

The Current Landscape

Despite the growing body of research advocating for a ban on smacking, the legal landscape remains unchanged in England and Northern Ireland. In contrast, Scotland became the first part of the UK to prohibit physical punishment of under-16s in 2020, followed by Wales in 2022. Naomi Long, Minister of Justice in Northern Ireland, has voiced her support for removing the defence of reasonable punishment, a move aimed at protecting children from potential harm while providing parents with alternative strategies for behaviour management.

Long asserted, “Removing the defence is not about criminalising parents; it is about protecting children from physical abuse and supporting parents with positive ways of dealing with behaviour.” However, recent proposals to modify existing legislation in Northern Ireland were dropped, leaving the status quo intact for the time being.

Why it Matters

The implications of this research extend far beyond academic performance; they touch on the very core of child welfare and societal values. As the conversation around smacking continues, it raises vital questions about how we, as a society, choose to raise the next generation. Advocating for a ban on smacking could signal a shift towards a more compassionate approach to parenting—one that prioritises emotional health and constructive discipline over physical punishment. Ensuring children grow up in nurturing environments is crucial not only for their academic success but also for their overall development as responsible and empathetic adults.

Share This Article
Hannah Clarke is a social affairs correspondent focusing on housing, poverty, welfare policy, and inequality. She has spent six years investigating the human impact of policy decisions on vulnerable communities. Her compassionate yet rigorous reporting has won multiple awards, including the Orwell Prize for Exposing Britain's Social Evils.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2026 The Update Desk. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy