New Research Links Smacking to Poor Academic Performance and Risky Behaviours in Children

Grace Kim, Education Correspondent
5 Min Read
⏱️ 4 min read

A recent study suggests that the practice of smacking children as a disciplinary measure could adversely affect their academic success and increase the likelihood of engaging in risky behaviours during adolescence. Conducted by researchers at University College London (UCL), the findings call for a reassessment of smacking’s legality in England and Northern Ireland, mirroring the bans already implemented in Scotland and Wales.

The Study’s Findings

The UCL research involved an extensive analysis of 19,000 children born in the UK between 2000 and 2002, examining the effects of physical punishment at ages three, five, and seven. The study’s lead researcher, Associate Professor Anja Heilmann, stated that the evidence gathered indicates smacking “does no good whatsoever” and is linked to harmful outcomes for children.

The research specifically evaluated the academic performance of 7,559 students in England, comparing their GCSE results against the National Pupil Database. The results revealed that children who were smacked were 5.7 percentage points more likely to fail to achieve five pass grades (A*-C) at GCSE level, including essential subjects such as English and Maths.

Moreover, the study highlighted that adolescents who experienced physical punishment in their early years were 33% more likely to engage in risky behaviours, including bullying, by the age of 14. Heilmann expressed hope that the findings would encourage the cessation of smacking in the UK, advocating for the same level of protection against physical assault that adults enjoy.

In light of these findings, campaigners are urging for a legal prohibition on smacking in England and Northern Ireland. Currently, smacking remains legal in both regions, although it is illegal in Scotland and Wales. The Department for Education in England has maintained that there are no plans to amend the current laws on smacking, although it acknowledges that the safety and wellbeing of children are priorities for the government.

The study’s observational nature means that while it draws substantial conclusions, it cannot definitively establish a direct cause-and-effect relationship between smacking and GCSE results, as various other factors may contribute to a child’s development and academic performance.

Diverse Perspectives on Smacking

Opinions regarding the legality of smacking are varied. Professor Ellie Lee, a family and parenting researcher at the University of Kent, noted that while the UCL study’s results seem plausible, there is often a tendency to oversimplify complex issues in child development. Lee, who is associated with the Be Reasonable England campaign, advocates for parental boundaries but cautions against viewing smacking as a straightforward solution.

Conversely, many parents and childcare professionals are advocating for a ban on smacking. Amy Woods, owner of Baby College in Salford, expressed disbelief that smacking remains legal, emphasising that children flourish in environments filled with warmth and positive interactions, not violence. Similarly, Sarah, a mother attending a local playgroup, stated that smacking sets a poor example, undermining the message that violence is unacceptable.

Legislative Developments

In Northern Ireland, Justice Minister Naomi Long has voiced strong support for removing the legal defence of reasonable punishment, which would effectively criminalise smacking. Although proposals to include this ban in a recent Bill were withdrawn, Long reiterated the importance of protecting children from physical abuse while supporting parents in employing positive disciplinary methods.

The UCL study also found that approximately one in five 10-year-olds had experienced some form of physical punishment in 2021, with the likelihood of smacking decreasing among mothers with higher educational qualifications.

Why it Matters

The implications of this research are profound. As the debate continues over the legality and morality of smacking, the findings suggest a potential link between physical punishment and negative outcomes in children’s educational and social development. Advocates for change argue that a ban on smacking would not only provide legal protection for children but also encourage the development of healthier, non-violent disciplinary practices among parents. In a society increasingly focused on child safeguarding, these discussions are critical in shaping future policies and nurturing a generation of children equipped for success.

Share This Article
Grace Kim covers education policy, from early years through to higher education and skills training. With a background as a secondary school teacher in Manchester, she brings firsthand classroom experience to her reporting. Her investigations into school funding disparities and academy trust governance have prompted official inquiries and policy reviews.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2026 The Update Desk. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy