**
In a revealing account of the Trump administration’s dealings with Ukraine, a new book unveils disparaging comments made by former Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent about President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Set to be published on 23 June 2026, *Regime Change*, authored by New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan, exposes the tensions that plagued a critical Oval Office meeting on 28 February 2025. This incident highlights the complexities of US foreign policy during a time of geopolitical strife.
Disparaging Descriptions and Diplomatic Tensions
According to the book, Bessent did not hold back in expressing his disdain for Zelenskyy, referring to him with a series of derogatory epithets including “little fucker,” “special-needs child,” and “Mr Bean on crack.” Such characterisations have raised eyebrows and are likely to cast a shadow over the Trump administration’s approach to international relations, particularly concerning Ukraine amid its ongoing conflict with Russia.
The meeting itself was fraught with tension. Trump and Senator JD Vance confronted Zelenskyy, chastising him for perceived ingratitude regarding American financial support. Reports indicate that Bessent had urged Trump to delay the meeting until after a minerals deal was signed, suggesting that such an agreement was vital before any discussions about aid could take place. This strategic misstep exemplifies the fragility of diplomatic communications during an already tumultuous period.
A Chaotic Precursor to the Oval Office Visit
Prior to the fateful meeting in Washington, Bessent had travelled to Kyiv in an effort to secure Zelenskyy’s signature on the minerals deal. The encounter reportedly turned combative, with both parties exchanging heated words for 45 minutes. Bessent, who had only recently assumed office, found himself in a shouting match with the Ukrainian leader, a situation that seemed ill-suited for a nation embroiled in conflict.
The negotiations faltered further as Bessent clashed with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick over the phrasing of the agreement. Ultimately, Trump sought the expertise of Usha Vance, JD Vance’s wife and a Yale Law School graduate, to review the document. Her assessment deemed it “awful,” signalling a lack of confidence in the administration’s handling of international agreements.
Aftermath and Reflections
Following the tumultuous Oval Office meeting, Bessent publicly critiqued Zelenskyy, declaring that the Ukrainian president had committed “one of the great diplomatic own goals.” He expressed shock at Zelenskyy’s behaviour during the meeting, suggesting that it disrespected both the presidency and the American populace. Such remarks indicate a profound disconnect between the administration’s expectations and the reality of diplomatic engagement.
Additionally, Bessent’s candid reflections on Trump himself may deepen the narrative of internal dissent within the administration. He reportedly likened Trump to George Soros, a figure often vilified by conservatives, stating, “They are the same animal.” This comparison could signal a significant ideological rift among top officials and complicate the already complex dynamics of US politics.
Why it Matters
The revelations from *Regime Change* not only shed light on the discord within the Trump administration but also underscore the broader implications for US foreign policy. As the relationship between the United States and Ukraine remains pivotal in the context of Russian aggression, understanding the interpersonal dynamics and communication failures among key decision-makers is crucial. This narrative serves as a reminder of the delicate nature of diplomacy and the potential consequences of mismanagement at the highest levels of government.
