In a significant development reflecting the deteriorating relations between Israel and Canada, the Israeli embassy has announced that Colonel Ilan Or, the country’s defence attaché, will return to Israel without a replacement. This decision highlights the growing strain in diplomatic ties, particularly in the wake of ongoing conflicts in Gaza. The reallocation of this critical military role to a cross-accredited officer based in the U.S. embassy signals a shift in priorities for Israel, as articulated by Ambassador Iddo Moed.
A Historical Shift in Military Diplomacy
The departure of Colonel Or marks the first time since 2012 that Israel will not have a dedicated defence attaché in Ottawa. Traditionally, such positions play a vital role in fostering military diplomacy and enhancing defence collaboration between nations. Philippe Lagassé, an associate professor at Carleton University, emphasised the importance of defence attachés in maintaining robust military-to-military ties, which are crucial for modern diplomatic relations. He noted that withdrawing a defence attaché often sends a strong signal of declining relations.
Ambassador Moed acknowledged the historical significance of this change, stating, “The last time we didn’t have a defence attaché in Canada was 14 years ago.” This withdrawal is not merely administrative; it underscores a broader narrative of diminishing ties between the two nations.
Reallocation of Resources and Strategic Partnerships
In response to inquiries regarding the decision, Ambassador Moed explained that Israel is opting to redirect its resources to enhance collaboration with “high-interest partners.” He maintained that while a defence attaché remains important, current strategic priorities necessitate this reallocation. The Israeli Ministry of Defence sought to downplay the significance of the move, framing it as part of a global realignment of its defence attachés rather than a diminishment of its commitment to Canada.
This transition comes at a time when Canada’s foreign policy towards Israel is under scrutiny, particularly following the suspension of new military export permits to Israel in January 2024. The Canadian government’s decision was influenced by international criticism regarding Israel’s military actions in Gaza, leading to a more cautious approach in its dealings with the Israeli government.
The Context of Current Relations
Relations between Israel and Canada have soured over the past few years, particularly amid the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Following Hamas’s attack on Israel in October 2023, which resulted in significant loss of life, Israel’s military response has drawn widespread condemnation. The situation in Gaza has escalated, with reports of extensive destruction and a humanitarian disaster affecting countless civilians. A United Nations inquiry recently accused Israel of committing genocide, a claim that Israel vehemently disputes.
In this fraught environment, Prime Minister Mark Carney’s recognition of a Palestinian state represents a marked shift from previous administrations. By doing so, Carney aims to preserve the viability of a two-state solution, highlighting the need for a balanced approach to peace in the region. This stance has further complicated Canada-Israel relations, as it aligns more closely with European allies in their criticisms of Israeli policies.
The Future of Defence Cooperation
Despite the withdrawal of the defence attaché, Israel asserts its commitment to strengthening defence cooperation with Canada. However, the effectiveness of such collaboration remains uncertain with a non-resident attaché managing relations from Washington. Ambassador Moed pointed out that while Israel’s defence industries could significantly contribute to Canada’s burgeoning defence sector, the lack of a dedicated representative in Ottawa may hinder these efforts.
In 2025, Canada still exported military goods valued at $14.7 million to Israel, despite the new restrictions. This continued trade underscores the complex dynamics at play, where economic interests intersect with political realities.
Why it Matters
The decision to withdraw the defence attaché represents more than just a bureaucratic change; it is emblematic of a broader geopolitical shift that could have lasting implications for both nations. As Canada reassesses its foreign policy and seeks to navigate the delicate waters of Middle Eastern diplomacy, the absence of a dedicated military representative from Israel may complicate efforts to rebuild trust and collaboration. The evolving landscape of international relations necessitates a careful approach, and the decisions made today will shape the future interactions between these two nations for years to come.