US Unleashes Tariffs on 60 Nations Over Forced Labour Allegations

Lisa Chang, Asia Pacific Correspondent
5 Min Read
⏱️ 4 min read

In a bold move reflecting heightened tensions in global trade, the United States has enacted new tariffs on 60 trading partners, citing failures to adequately combat forced labour in their supply chains. The tariffs, ranging from 10% to 12.5%, affect major economies, including the UK, China, the European Union, Canada, Japan, and India. This decision, which took effect on Friday, follows the expiration of a temporary 10% levy introduced earlier this year and marks a significant escalation in the ongoing trade conflict initiated by former President Donald Trump.

Background of the Tariff Decision

The latest tariffs emerge in a climate of uncertainty following a ruling by the US Supreme Court that deemed many previously imposed tariffs under emergency powers unlawful. In response to these legal setbacks, the Trump administration has sought alternative pathways to continue its aggressive trade policy. Last month, the White House proposed imposing duties on imports from numerous countries, citing insufficient efforts to eradicate forced labour practices.

On Thursday, US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, acting under Trump’s directive, confirmed that the proposed tariffs would be implemented. “Today’s action will begin to correct what is both a human rights abuse and a distortive trade practice to improve the welfare of workers everywhere,” Greer stated, invoking Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to justify the enforcement of these measures.

Scope and Impact of the Tariffs

The newly established tariffs will cover nearly 99.4% of all US imports from the targeted countries. The US Trade Representative’s office explained that while countries that demonstrate a commitment to enforce bans on goods produced with forced labour will face a 10% tariff, those that do not comply will incur the higher 12.5% rate. This strategy is intended to incentivise adherence to ethical labour standards and reshape international trade norms.

Deborah Elms, a trade policy expert at the Hinrich Foundation, remarked on the determination of the Trump administration to pursue its tariff strategy, despite the complexities involved. The new levies are projected to increase costs for both businesses and consumers, although some relief may arise from the exclusion of certain goods from these tariffs, as noted by Wendy Cutler, an economic security expert at the Asia Society Policy Institute.

Many affected nations have expressed discontent over the tariffs. Brazil, for instance, branded the imposition as “unjustified,” asserting that the US is exploiting a crucial issue of workers’ rights to bolster its own protectionist agenda. The Brazilian government has indicated it will respond under its “reciprocity law,” potentially imposing countermeasures.

Global Reactions and Future Implications

Responses from various nations have highlighted the contentious nature of the tariffs. Japan, for instance, expressed regret, asserting that its trade practices align with international standards. Australia’s Trade Minister Don Farrell condemned the tariffs as “completely unjustified” and vowed to engage with Washington to seek their removal.

China has categorically rejected the allegations of forced labour, with its foreign ministry spokesperson, Mao Ning, stating, “There is no so-called forced labour in China, and we oppose using this as an excuse for political manipulation.” This denial stands in stark contrast to reports from international human rights organisations that cite evidence of forced labour practices, particularly concerning ethnic minorities in Xinjiang.

Why it Matters

The introduction of these tariffs not only signals a renewed commitment by the US to address human rights issues linked to global trade but also escalates the ongoing trade conflict that has reshaped international economic relations. As countries scramble to adjust their trade strategies in response, the tariffs may inadvertently accelerate a shift towards de-globalisation, with nations seeking to lessen their economic dependence on the US market. This could lead to a reconfiguration of trade alliances across the Asia-Pacific region and beyond, fundamentally altering the landscape of international commerce as we know it.

Share This Article
Lisa Chang is an Asia Pacific correspondent based in London, covering the region's political and economic developments with particular focus on China, Japan, and Southeast Asia. Fluent in Mandarin and Cantonese, she previously spent five years reporting from Hong Kong for the South China Morning Post. She holds a Master's in Asian Studies from SOAS.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2026 The Update Desk. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy