**
The conversation surrounding neurodiversity, particularly Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), is gaining momentum in UK workplaces. Recent cases, including one involving Lidl’s former employee Ryan Toghill, highlight the urgent need for businesses to adapt to the unique challenges faced by neurodivergent individuals. As diagnosis rates soar, companies must reevaluate their practices or risk encountering legal disputes and a disengaged workforce.
A Case Study in Workplace Challenges
Ryan Toghill, a deputy store manager at Lidl, found himself embroiled in a lengthy employment tribunal after disclosing his ADHD diagnosis to his superiors. Following a disciplinary meeting where he was dismissed for gross misconduct—stemming from using equipment without proper training—Toghill appealed the decision. His case culminated in an award exceeding £45,000, as the tribunal established that Lidl failed to consider his ADHD during the disciplinary process, neglecting to make reasonable adjustments, such as allowing additional breaks.
Toghill’s experience underscores a growing trend in workplaces where neurodivergent employees are not adequately understood or supported. “I don’t show a lot of emotions,” he explains, highlighting the communication barriers often faced by those with ADHD. The tribunal’s ruling not only recognised his unfair dismissal but also pointed to systemic issues within corporate handling of neurodiversity.
The Rise of Neurodivergent Diagnoses
The number of individuals diagnosed with neurodivergent conditions like ADHD and autism has surged in recent years, particularly since the pandemic. According to research from University College London, diagnoses of ADHD among UK adults increased nearly twentyfold between 2000 and 2018. Despite this rise, some experts warn that both ADHD and autism remain underdiagnosed, especially in older adults.
The legal landscape is also shifting. In 2025, there were over 500 tribunal cases related to neurodivergent conditions, a significant jump from just 265 in 2020. This spike reflects not only heightened awareness but also an increasing willingness among neurodivergent individuals to seek legal recourse when their needs are overlooked.
Employers Must Adapt or Face Consequences
Experts argue that many disputes arise not from intentional discrimination but from a lack of understanding regarding reasonable adjustments and support for neurodivergent employees. Lutfur Ali, a diversity and inclusion adviser, notes that businesses often struggle to implement processes that accommodate different thinking styles. Many managers feel unprepared to engage in conversations about neurodiversity due to inadequate training and resources.
Employment lawyer Jodie Hill highlights that some employers mistakenly require formal diagnoses to consider support requests. This approach can lead to legal vulnerabilities, as the Equality Act 2010 provides protections for those with neurodivergent conditions, regardless of formal diagnosis.
Companies, particularly larger ones, are expected to make adjustments that might include flexible working hours, designated quiet spaces, or regular breaks—all of which can be implemented at minimal cost. However, the challenge lies in overcoming misconceptions and fostering an inclusive culture that prioritises mental health.
The Disconnect Between Employers and Employees
Despite a general increase in employer awareness of neurodiversity, significant gaps remain in employee experiences. A recent survey by City and Guilds Foundation revealed that while employers rated their neurodivergent readiness at 70-75%, only 32-38% of neurodivergent employees felt psychologically safe disclosing their conditions. This disconnect highlights the urgent need for businesses to bridge the gap between intention and execution.
Daniel Rickman, who runs a glazing company, has taken proactive steps by offering all employees various adjustments, such as flexible hours and sensory tools in meeting rooms. His approach not only enhances productivity but also fosters employee loyalty. However, he has faced criticism for being “woke,” illustrating the polarisation that can accompany discussions around workplace inclusivity.
Why it Matters
The growing recognition of ADHD and other neurodivergent conditions in the workplace is not just a legal obligation but a crucial component of fostering a thriving and productive environment. As companies navigate the complexities of inclusivity, the lessons learned from cases like Ryan Toghill’s must be heeded. By embracing diversity and making reasonable adjustments, businesses can unlock the potential of neurodivergent individuals, ultimately contributing to a more innovative and compassionate workforce. Failure to adapt will not only lead to costly legal disputes but also risk alienating a segment of the workforce that offers unique perspectives and skills.