**
A recently reviewed document has unveiled troubling practices within the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) system, revealing that at least one detainee who participated in a hunger strike was subjected to involuntary medical treatments during the Trump administration. This disclosure raises significant concerns about the treatment of individuals in detention and the ethical implications of such actions.
Forced Treatment and Human Rights Concerns
An internal report from ICE’s health service agency confirms that an unnamed individual, who began hunger strikes between October and December of the previous year, was forced to undergo treatments including hydration, blood draws, and urinary catheterisation. Medical experts and human rights advocates have condemned these actions, characterising them as forms of torture.
Eunice Cho, an attorney specialising in immigrant rights, expressed her alarm over these revelations, stating, “This admission is shocking.” Cho co-authored a 2021 report detailing the severe medical repercussions faced by hunger strikers coerced into treatment. The report indicates that ICE has budgeted approximately $4,504.75 for external medical care related to hunger strikes in the current fiscal year, with an overall budget of $168,928.01 earmarked for 2026.
Rising Instances of Hunger Strikes
The number of hunger strikers has surged, with at least seven detainees reported on hunger strike as recently as February. During the summer, hundreds participated in strikes across various detention centres, including a significant protest at the Delaney Hall facility in Newark, New Jersey. Activists have pointed out that detainees often resort to hunger strikes to protest poor living conditions and inadequate medical care, describing their experiences as tantamount to psychological and physical torture.
The situation at Delaney Hall became a focal point for national protests, as demonstrators rallied in support of the hunger strikers. Reports indicate that the strikers were met with retaliation, leading to an end to their actions. In a similar vein, detainees at the Adelanto detention centre in California faced threats, confinement, and transfers in response to their hunger strikes, according to attorneys from the Immigrant Defenders Law Centre (ImmDef).
Government Response and Legal Framework
In response to these alarming findings, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has maintained that all detainees receive three meals daily, failing to address inquiries regarding the nature of forced treatments administered. ICE is required to obtain a federal judge’s order before proceeding with the forced treatment of hunger strikers. However, Cho has highlighted the lack of due process, suggesting that many detainees lack legal representation, which leads to the approval of such orders without adequate scrutiny.
The forced medical procedures, particularly force-feeding, have been widely criticised for their brutality. This practice can result in significant physical complications, including potential organ damage and severe infections. The notoriety of force-feedings, particularly during the first Trump administration, has drawn international condemnation, echoing past abuses witnessed at Guantánamo Bay.
Historical Context of Forced Medical Treatments
The practice of force-feeding detainees gained attention during the first term of the Trump administration, particularly with incidents reported at an ICE facility in El Paso in 2019. The release of a video in 2022 showing the force-feeding of an Indian asylum seeker, Ajay Kumar, brought further scrutiny to ICE’s methods. Following public outcry, ICE released Kumar and other hunger strikers from custody.
The ethical implications of such forced treatments continue to be a point of contention, as many argue that they violate basic human rights. The international community has denounced similar practices in the past, reiterating the need for humane treatment of all individuals in custody.
Why it Matters
The revelations surrounding forced medical treatment of hunger strikers within ICE detention centres expose deeper systemic issues regarding the treatment of migrants and detainees in the United States. As hunger strikes serve as a form of protest against intolerable conditions, the government’s response raises critical questions about human rights and ethical standards in immigration detention. The ongoing struggle for humane treatment and accountability within these facilities underscores the urgent need for reform and greater oversight as advocates continue to fight for the rights of the most vulnerable.
