**
In a concerning trend, many individuals escaping the oppressive Iranian regime are finding themselves denied refugee or resident status in Canada, primarily due to their past military service. Legal experts, including immigration lawyer Lorne Waldman, have raised alarms over the plight of these asylum seekers, who are often conscripted into the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) against their will. As they seek safety, the obstacles placed in their path can be both devastating and life-altering.
Compulsory Military Service in Iran
For many men in Iran, military service is not a choice but a compulsory obligation. A woman at a recent protest in Montreal, who opted to remain anonymous for fear of compromising her family’s immigration application, articulated the harsh realities: “In Iran, if you want to work, if you want to obtain a passport and minimum rights, you have to serve.” The consequences of refusing military service can be dire, leading to imprisonment and often brutal treatment within the penal system.
Waldman emphasised the gravity of this issue, noting how the Canadian immigration system’s stance on conscripted individuals can lead to tragic outcomes. “To be told, ‘No, we don’t want you because you were forced to join the organization,’ it’s devastating,” he stated.
A Divided Legal Perspective
Not all experts agree on the handling of these complicated cases. The Canadian government classified the IRGC as a terrorist organisation in 2024, complicating the assessment of individuals’ affiliations with the group. James Devine, an associate professor at Mount Alliston University in New Brunswick, highlighted the challenges of differentiating between regime supporters and those who were coerced into service. “You have to be able to go back through the person’s background and look for a pattern of activity in terms of what groups they were associated with,” he explained.
This nuanced approach, however, does not seem to be reflected in the outcomes for many applicants. Waldman pointed out that he has yet to see a case where the Immigration Refugee and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) or the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) has granted a conscripted Iranian individual a positive outcome in their application. With 48 individuals reported inadmissible as of July 6 due to IRGC membership, the stakes are high.
Government’s Stance on Conscription
In response to concerns, the IRCC stated that while membership in the IRGC typically leads to inadmissibility, those who served due to compulsory military conscription are assessed individually. “Conscription alone does not necessarily result in inadmissibility,” the agency clarified, adding that applicants are encouraged to provide relevant documentation to support their claims.
Despite these reassurances, many in the Iranian community in Montreal continue to feel the pressure of potential deportation. Their resolve to advocate for changes in immigration policy remains strong, as they plead with the Canadian government to reconsider the implications of its current stance on conscription.
Why it Matters
The treatment of Iranian asylum seekers in Canada raises profound questions about the intersection of justice and immigration policy. As these individuals flee persecution, the barriers they encounter in securing safety can not only shatter their hopes for a new life but also reflect broader issues of human rights and international responsibility. It is crucial for Canada to navigate this complex landscape with empathy and diligence, ensuring that those who have been forced into military service are not unjustly penalised for the actions of a regime they sought to escape.