Freeland Warns of Chinese Law Echoing Putin’s Justifications for War

Liam MacKenzie, Senior Political Correspondent (Ottawa)
5 Min Read
⏱️ 4 min read

Former Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland has raised concerns over a controversial new Chinese law that allows the prosecution of individuals and organisations globally for allegedly undermining the country’s “ethnic unity.” Speaking at a security forum in Taiwan, she drew alarming parallels between this legislation and the rhetoric employed by Vladimir Putin prior to his invasion of Ukraine in 2022, urging democratic nations to firmly oppose such authoritarian measures.

The Law on Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress, which came into effect on July 1, grants Beijing extensive power to hold individuals outside its borders accountable for actions deemed detrimental to its national cohesion. Critics argue that the vague language of the law, particularly the provision allowing for prosecution of those who “undermine ethnic unity and progress or create ethnic division,” presents a significant risk of arbitrary enforcement. This opens the door for potential crackdowns on dissent, particularly against those in Taiwan who Beijing views as separatists.

Freeland’s remarks came during her keynote address at the Ketagalan Forum, an event hosted by Taiwan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. She underscored the dangers posed by the new legal framework, likening it to the justifications used by Russia regarding its incursions into Ukraine. “Article 63 is particularly sinister,” she remarked, highlighting its resemblance to the cultural and ethnic rationales Russia has historically employed to justify territorial aggression.

Historical Lessons and the Case for Firm Stance

In her address, Freeland invoked her experiences covering Ukraine during the Soviet Union’s collapse, as well as her tenure as deputy prime minister during the recent conflict. She pointed out that appeasing authoritarian regimes historically leads to increased aggression, citing the West’s inadequate responses to Russia’s earlier military actions in Georgia and Crimea as lessons that must not be forgotten. “We taught Putin to believe we would not have the resolve to support Ukraine,” she stated, emphasising the need for unambiguous support for nations under threat.

Freeland also articulated the strategic significance of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, suggesting that its capabilities could provide democratic allies with a crucial advantage in countering reliance on authoritarian states. She advocated for Taiwan’s inclusion in the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), arguing that doing so would fortify global supply chains against potential disruptions caused by hostile actors.

The Importance of Solidarity with Taiwan

As the geopolitical landscape continues to shift, Freeland highlighted the necessity for democratic nations to openly communicate their commitment to maintaining peace in the Taiwan Strait. She asserted, “The peace of the Strait of Taiwan will be kept by the plainness with which the world’s democracies say in advance that we will not accept that peace being broken.” This call to action underscores the critical role of solidarity with Taiwan as a bulwark against aggression.

Despite the seriousness of her message, the Chinese embassy in Canada has not yet commented on Freeland’s statements. However, the state-run Global Times dismissed the Ketagalan Forum as a platform for “former and marginal foreign politicians” advocating for Taiwanese independence, reflecting the ongoing tensions surrounding the issue.

Why it Matters

Freeland’s warnings resonate far beyond the immediate region, serving as a stark reminder of the potential consequences of inaction in the face of authoritarian expansionism. As democracies grapple with the implications of this new Chinese legislation, the need for a unified and proactive response becomes increasingly apparent. The stakes are high; the world must stand resolute in defence of its values or risk emboldening those who seek to undermine them. Taiwan’s fate may well serve as a litmus test for the strength and resolve of democratic nations in confronting global threats.

Share This Article
Covering federal politics and national policy from the heart of Ottawa.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2026 The Update Desk. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy