**
In a troubling development for climate science, the Trump administration has withdrawn its support for the Arctic Report Card, a crucial annual assessment of environmental changes in the rapidly warming Arctic region. This decision, announced by Kim Doster, communications director of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), marks a significant setback in the United States’ commitment to understanding and addressing climate change.
A Critical Resource Discarded
Since its inception in 2006, the Arctic Report Card has provided vital updates on the status of the Arctic’s atmosphere, oceans, and ecosystems. As the region heats up at a staggering rate—four times faster than the global average—this report has become increasingly important. Yet, NOAA’s recent announcement reveals a shocking lack of clarity regarding the reasons for this withdrawal, leaving scientists and policymakers concerned about the future of Arctic research.
Doster stated that while NOAA would no longer facilitate coordination of the 2026 report, data collected historically would still be accessible to the public. However, the absence of federal support raises significant questions about the continuity and credibility of future reports.
The Growing Climate Crisis
The impacts of climate change in the Arctic are profound. The 2025 Arctic Report Card revealed alarming trends: surface temperatures were at their highest since 1900, and March 2025 recorded the lowest sea ice maximum in nearly five decades. Glacial retreat is contributing to rising sea levels, threatening local communities and their freshwater resources. Additionally, permafrost thaw has led to an unsettling phenomenon—rivers in over 200 watersheds have turned orange due to iron and other elements leaching into them, exacerbating water quality issues and affecting local fisheries.
Rick Thoman, the lead editor for this year’s report, expressed his determination to salvage future assessments despite the current setback. “We are scrambling to pull the pieces together,” he said, acknowledging the challenges ahead.
Implications of Federal Withdrawal
The implications of this decision extend beyond the Arctic itself. Twila Moon, another editor and a scientist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center, emphasised the interconnectedness of Arctic changes with broader climatic patterns. “The US is an Arctic nation,” she noted. “The changes there have impacts that reach down into our mid-latitudes, even further south.”
Rick Spinrad, former NOAA administrator, described the decision as “really unconscionable,” highlighting its detrimental effects on infrastructure planning in Alaska and beyond. He lamented the loss of a critical tool for communities reliant on accurate environmental data to navigate the increasing unpredictability brought on by climate change.
A Pattern of Neglect
Critics argue that this latest move is part of a broader pattern of the Trump administration undermining climate science. Since taking office, the administration has dismantled key research initiatives and removed references to climate change from government materials, raising alarms about the future of federal climate policy. The cancellation of funding for the Arctic Report Card is just one more example of a troubling disregard for scientific understanding and public safety.
Why it Matters
The decision to withdraw support for the Arctic Report Card signals a significant retreat from scientific engagement at a time when the stakes could not be higher. As the Arctic continues to experience unprecedented changes, the need for robust, government-supported climate research has never been more critical. Without this essential data, communities, policymakers, and scientists are left to grapple with the consequences of a changing climate without the guidance necessary to inform effective responses. The repercussions of this decision will resonate far beyond the Arctic, underscoring the urgent need for a renewed commitment to climate science in the face of an escalating global crisis.
