**
As the fifth anniversary of the tumultuous withdrawal of Western forces from Afghanistan approaches, advocates are intensifying their calls for improved planning and support for Afghan nationals who worked alongside NATO during the conflict. Local Staff International, alongside U.S.-based AfghanEvac, has released a report urging governments to establish comprehensive frameworks to safeguard the welfare of local employees in future military, diplomatic, or humanitarian missions.
A Legacy of Uncertainty
The chaotic exit from Afghanistan in August 2021 left many who had assisted Western forces in precarious situations. The fall of Kandahar, a pivotal centre of Canada’s military operations, marked the beginning of a scramble to evacuate tens of thousands of Afghans whose lives were at risk due to their association with foreign entities. Sara De Jong, co-chair of Local Staff International, highlighted the disarray that characterised the evacuation process, stating, “Every country made up their own rules and made up their own eligibility criteria for local staff.” This fragmentation exacerbated the distress of Afghans who believed they were part of a coordinated effort.
The newly published report, titled *The Allied Ledger*, lays out essential guidelines for countries to establish effective protocols when engaging local staff in conflict zones. Among its key recommendations is the necessity for pre-emptive planning that includes provisions for local personnel during and after missions, as well as strategies for addressing crises that may arise post-operation. De Jong pointed out that issues such as time-limited employment, clear definitions of affiliation, and meticulous record-keeping are paramount for ensuring that local staff can access necessary immigration avenues in the future.
The Scale of Resettlement Efforts
Prior to the Taliban’s resurgence, Canada had successfully resettled around 800 Afghans and their families through targeted immigration initiatives. However, many were left behind as the situation unfolded. Following the evacuation flights, various countries initiated their own immigration programmes to assist Afghan nationals. In Canada alone, approximately 63,000 Afghans were resettled, although this number included individuals from vulnerable populations beyond those directly linked to military operations.
The statistics presented in *The Allied Ledger* reveal the scale of the humanitarian crisis. The United States approved nearly 180,000 Afghans for entry under special immigration measures, while the United Kingdom and Germany cleared approximately 40,000 and 45,000, respectively. Despite these figures, the report indicates that current government programmes have either ceased intake, frozen processing, or been entirely cancelled. As a result, many Afghans remain in limbo, particularly in the United States, where shifting immigration policies have left 178,000 approved applicants stranded.
The Ongoing Struggle for Afghan Allies
Retired Major-General Denis Thompson, who once led NATO’s Joint Task Force in Kandahar, provided critical insights during a recent briefing. He noted that around 5,500 Afghans with connections to Canada still await resettlement. Thompson, who had previously advocated for the rights of former Afghan employees, pointed out that public pressure played a significant role in the initial Canadian response to the crisis. However, with the government now preoccupied by other global conflicts and a trade war with the United States, he cautioned that reviving interest in Afghan resettlement would be a challenging endeavour.
Advocates are calling for the reopening of immigration pathways for Afghans and increased funding for organisations like Aman Lara, which is dedicated to evacuating former staff members. Although the federal Immigration Department has indicated that alternative application streams are available, the closure of special immigration programmes has left many feeling abandoned.
De Jong emphasised the moral imperative of supporting local staff, stating, “If we fail to honour our duty of care now, that also jeopardises our credibility and integrity for future missions.”
Why it Matters
The plight of Afghan allies underscores a broader issue of accountability and support in international military engagements. As nations reflect on the chaos that followed the withdrawal from Afghanistan, the lessons learned will be crucial for shaping future foreign interventions. Ensuring that local personnel are adequately protected and supported is not only a matter of ethical responsibility but also vital for maintaining trust in international alliances. As discussions continue, the fate of thousands hangs in the balance, reminding us of the human cost of geopolitical decisions.
