Ottawa has published the full scope of its retaliation against Washington’s 50-per-cent tariffs, levying duties on roughly 900 American products worth $28-billion. The measures, set to take effect on 8 September, span fishing rods to industrial machinery and signal a calibrated — if painful — response to the collapse of bilateral trade talks.
Prime Minister Mark Carney had pledged a dollar-for-dollar response to President Donald Trump’s tariffs on $27.6-billion of Canadian goods. The newly released list, covering everything from honey to hair products, metal furniture to motorcycles, demonstrates that Ottawa has studied Washington’s own tariff playbook closely. Several items mirror those Trump has previously targeted. But the scale of trade in each category is rarely symmetrical, meaning the economic damage will not be shared evenly.
A Mirror, Not a Match
Canada’s counter-tariffs were designed to echo the American approach, but the underlying trade flows tell a more lopsided story. Canada, for example, ships far more insulated electric wire and cable to the United States than it imports, meaning Canadian producers stand to lose more from that line than their American counterparts. Honey follows a similar pattern.
Networking equipment, by contrast, sees roughly balanced flows in both directions. The asymmetry in many categories suggests Ottawa has chosen items where retaliation is politically resonant at home, even if the economic pain is not perfectly reciprocal.
Consumers Will Feel the Bite
The federal government has announced a $7.5-billion support package for businesses and workers, but there is little doubt that Canadian shoppers will absorb some of the impact. Importers will pass higher costs down the supply chain, and reduced American competition will give domestic producers more room to raise prices.

Industrial goods like steel, aluminium and networking equipment account for the largest dollar values on the list. Yet it is the consumer-facing items — golf clubs, hair products, video game consoles, clothing and furniture — that will land most directly on household budgets.
Regional Exposure Across the United States
Not every American state will bear the brunt equally. Maine is particularly vulnerable: it exported $300-million of lobster to Canada in 2025, and roughly one-third of the products on Canada’s list are seafood. Pennsylvania faces a significant hit, with more than $120-million of motorcycles — much of it Harley-Davidson — now subject to a 50-per-cent tariff.
Ohio, however, is arguably the most exposed state. It sends $3.2-billion in tariff-covered goods north of the border, dominated by metals and metal derivatives.
From Zero to 50
Ottawa’s retaliation targets two distinct categories. The first comprises goods already subject to tariffs, where Canada is simply raising the rate. The most consequential example: existing duties on steel, aluminium and their derivative products are being doubled from 25 to 50 per cent.

The second category covers goods that currently enter Canada duty-free. Many of these face tariffs for the first time. Among them, networking equipment stands out. Canada imported $920-million worth of routers, switches and similar products in 2025. At a 50-per-cent rate, that translates into a $460-million duty bill — a substantial new cost flowing directly to American exporters.
Why it Matters
Canada’s counter-tariff list is as much a political statement as an economic weapon. By targeting consumer goods alongside industrial staples, Ottawa has ensured that ordinary Canadians will feel the trade war in their wallets — and that pressure may shape public attitudes toward the broader US–Canada relationship. For American exporters, particularly in lobster-dependent Maine, motorcycle-heavy Pennsylvania and metals-driven Ohio, the 8 September deadline represents a sudden and substantial loss of market access. Whether the pain on both sides forces a return to the negotiating table, or entrenches a longer-term rupture, will define the next phase of North American trade.