Alberta Premier Seeks Greater Control Over Judicial Appointments

Chloe Henderson, National News Reporter (Vancouver)
5 Min Read
⏱️ 4 min read

In a bold move to reshape the judicial landscape in Alberta, Premier Danielle Smith has formally requested that Prime Minister Mark Carney grant her United Conservative Party government increased authority over judicial appointments. Citing the province’s unique legal traditions, Smith’s demands include a push for more influence in selecting judges for the Supreme Court of Canada and a reduction in bilingualism requirements for judicial candidates.

Premier’s Letter to the Prime Minister

Smith’s appeal, made public on Tuesday, outlines her vision for a revised judicial appointment process that prioritises provincial input. In her letter dated January 23, she threatened to withhold funding for three vacant positions on the Alberta Court of King’s Bench if her requests are not addressed. “We are simply asking for a formal and meaningful role in the judicial appointment process,” she stated, asserting that such changes would bolster national unity amid growing separatist sentiments in the province.

Currently, Canada’s Constitution places the responsibility for judicial appointments in the hands of the federal government. Judges for the Supreme Court, as well as federal and provincial courts, are appointed through a system established by Ottawa in the late 1980s. Each province, including Alberta, has a judicial advisory committee that assesses candidates and recommends them to the federal government.

Proposed Changes to the Appointment Process

Smith’s proposal seeks to streamline the current system by introducing a four-member committee composed of two representatives from Alberta and two from Ottawa. This committee would be tasked with creating a shortlist of candidates for judicial appointments, which would then be reviewed by both provincial and federal justice ministers. Critics, however, question the feasibility of this approach, particularly regarding the Supreme Court, where existing practices involve an independent advisory board that presents candidates to the Prime Minister.

Legal experts have expressed skepticism about Smith’s assertions of Alberta’s distinct legal traditions, noting that the province’s judicial framework is fundamentally rooted in the same common law system shared with the rest of Canada, excluding Quebec.

Controversial Bilingualism Requirements

Among her other proposals, Smith has called for a reassessment of bilingualism requirements for Supreme Court judges. Following amendments to the Official Languages Act in 2023, judges are now expected to understand both French and English without an interpreter. Smith argues that this requirement creates “systemic barriers” for candidates from Western Canada. Legal professionals have voiced mixed opinions on this issue, suggesting that while flexibility could be beneficial, it should not compromise the integrity of the judicial system.

Implications of Smith’s Demands

In recent months, Smith has made headlines with various initiatives aimed at increasing provincial power over the judicial system. Her controversial comment on a radio show in late January, where she expressed a desire to “direct the judges,” was met with criticism and prompted Alberta’s acting Chief Justice to reaffirm the necessity of an independent judiciary.

Some analysts suggest that Smith’s latest actions reflect an ongoing strategy to challenge the federal government on multiple fronts, as she seeks to consolidate her party’s influence over provincial judicial matters. However, experts remain cautious, indicating that significant changes to the appointment process are unlikely to materialise.

Why it Matters

Smith’s demands for greater control over judicial appointments underscore a growing tension between provincial and federal authorities in Canada. As Alberta grapples with issues of representation and governance, the implications of these proposals could resonate far beyond the courtroom, potentially reshaping the relationship between provinces and Ottawa. The unfolding situation also highlights the delicate balance between ensuring judicial independence and accommodating regional interests, a challenge that will require careful navigation in the months ahead.

Share This Article
Reporting on breaking news and social issues across Western Canada.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2026 The Update Desk. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy