**
In a significant development, the United States and Iran have agreed to engage in nuclear negotiations in Muscat, Oman, this Friday. The discussions come at a time of heightened tensions, with President Donald Trump issuing stern warnings to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, over the country’s nuclear ambitions and its response to domestic protests.
Talks Scheduled Amidst Hostilities
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi announced that the meeting is slated to commence at 10:00 local time (06:00 GMT). Both US and Iranian officials have confirmed the venue, despite earlier uncertainties regarding the talks’ location and agenda. The negotiations were reportedly jeopardised by disagreements between the two nations, but recent diplomatic interventions have helped to restore momentum.
President Trump has escalated military readiness in the region, signalling that any failure to reach an agreement could provoke a strong military response. In an interview with NBC News, Trump remarked, “I would say [Khamenei] should be very worried,” highlighting the precarious nature of the ongoing discussions.
Diplomatic Maneuvering Under Scrutiny
The negotiations have been fluid, with an Arab diplomat revealing to CBS News that the talks had never officially been cancelled, although they had faced significant turbulence. Reports indicate that interventions from various Arab and Muslim leaders helped persuade the Trump administration to reconsider its stance on withdrawing from the negotiations.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio indicated that preparations for the talks involved special envoy Steve Witkoff, who had been ready to engage with Iranian officials alongside other regional representatives in Turkey. However, conflicting information regarding Iran’s willingness to participate had initially stalled progress.
Rubio emphasised that for the talks to yield meaningful outcomes, they must extend beyond Iran’s nuclear programme, encompassing issues such as Iran’s ballistic missile capabilities, its regional support for militant groups, and human rights considerations within the country.
Iran’s Position and Future Expectations
In a recent CNN interview, Araghchi expressed Iran’s openness to discussing US demands concerning its missile programme and support for proxy militias, alongside the production of enriched uranium. He underscored Iran’s commitment to avoiding nuclear weapons, stating, “President Trump said, ‘no nuclear weapons,’ and we fully agree with that. That could be a very good deal. Of course, in return we expect sanction lifting.”
While Iran has consistently maintained that its nuclear programme is peaceful, Trump has voiced concerns that Iran could acquire a nuclear weapon in a matter of weeks. He attributed the escalation to ongoing military actions, including US airstrikes against Iranian nuclear facilities during the recent conflict between Israel and Iran.
Domestic Unrest Complicates Situation
The backdrop of these negotiations is marked by significant unrest in Iran, triggered by economic turmoil and a collapse in the national currency. Protests have escalated into demands for political reform, leading to a violent crackdown by security forces, resulting in numerous casualties. The Human Rights Activists News Agency has reported thousands of fatalities, raising international alarm over human rights abuses.
Khamenei has labelled the protests as “sedition” orchestrated by foreign powers, further complicating the diplomatic landscape. In light of these events, the US has reiterated its support for Iranian protesters, asserting that it stands with those advocating for change.
Why it Matters
The upcoming talks in Oman represent a pivotal moment in US-Iran relations, potentially shaping the future of regional stability and nuclear non-proliferation efforts. As both nations navigate a complex web of diplomatic, military, and public pressures, the outcome of these discussions could have far-reaching implications, not only for Iran but also for broader geopolitical dynamics in the Asia-Pacific and beyond. The world will be watching closely as the fate of nuclear negotiations hangs in the balance against a backdrop of escalating tensions and domestic strife.
