**
US political discourse is increasingly dominated by discussions surrounding the need to dismantle structures that perpetuate systemic violence and discrimination. Among the leading voices advocating for this change is Jason Stanley, a professor of American studies at the University of Toronto, who argues that the abolition of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is a crucial step in countering the rise of fascism in America. His remarks come amidst growing concern over state-sanctioned violence and the targeting of minority populations.
Historical Context of State Violence
In a recent commentary, Stanley draws parallels between the present climate in the United States and historical instances of oppression, particularly against Black Americans. He references Aimé Césaire’s concept of the “imperial boomerang thesis,” which suggests that the violent tactics employed by colonial powers eventually return to affect the societies that created them. This framework positions Black Americans as an internally colonised group, highlighting the ongoing violence against them as a precursor to broader societal unrest.
As protests against police brutality continue to escalate, Stanley contends that the recent surge in state violence is symptomatic of a deeper issue—fascism that has long been embedded within American governance. He points to the arbitrary nature of legal practices that have historically targeted marginalised groups and warns that these tactics are now being generalised to the population at large.
The Role of ICE and Homeland Security
Stanley asserts that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), created in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, has increasingly infringed upon civil liberties, particularly affecting Muslim Americans. He argues that the DHS has evolved into a tool for enforcing a regime of fear and control, not only targeting immigrants but also silencing dissent among journalists and activists, particularly those from Black communities.
The professor emphasises that the escalation of violence against specific groups, such as Somali and Haitian immigrants, serves as a stark warning of the regime’s capacity for terror. Under such authoritarian conditions, even those outside of these targeted groups face deteriorating conditions, as essential services and rights are eroded in favour of a paranoid and oppressive state.
A Call for Systemic Change
Stanley’s argument culminates in a passionate plea for the abolition of ICE and the DHS. He posits that dismantling these institutions is not merely an act of reform but a necessary move to combat the underlying structures that have allowed fascism to take root in American society. He highlights the alarming statistics surrounding incarceration rates, noting that the US has some of the highest rates in the world, especially among minority populations.
By addressing these systemic issues, Stanley believes that society can begin to extinguish the flames of fascism that threaten to engulf it. The abolition of ICE, he argues, is an essential step towards reclaiming civil rights for all Americans and dismantling the oppressive frameworks that have historically targeted specific groups.
Why it Matters
The call to abolish ICE reflects a broader critique of systemic injustice and the urgent need to confront the mechanisms of state violence that have persisted for decades. As the nation grapples with its history of racial discrimination and authoritarianism, the voices advocating for change are increasingly insistent. The stakes are high, as the fight against fascism is not only about protecting the rights of the most vulnerable but also about safeguarding the democratic principles that underpin the nation. In this context, the movement to abolish ICE emerges as a crucial battleground in the struggle for justice and equality in America.
