In a developing saga that could reshape the landscape of the UK acting industry, Equity, the national union representing performers, has announced its intention to appeal a recent court ruling that dismissed its case against Spotlight, the prominent casting directory. This legal struggle stems from concerns about rising membership fees, which Equity argues are unjustly burdening actors.
A Longstanding Relationship Turns Contentious
For nearly a century, Spotlight has served as a pivotal resource for actors seeking opportunities across theatre, film, and television. Renowned personalities including Laurence Olivier, Olivia Colman, and Daniel Craig have relied on this comprehensive platform to showcase their talents. However, following its acquisition by the US-based Talent Systems in 2021, tensions have escalated between the two entities.
Spotlight, which boasts a membership of approximately 100,000 actors and performers across the UK and Ireland, was historically owned by the Seale family, fostering a close-knit relationship with Equity since its founding in 1927, three years prior to the establishment of the union. The new ownership structure has prompted Equity to scrutinise Spotlight’s operations, particularly the rising costs imposed on its members.
Rising Fees and the “Tax on Hope”
Equity’s concerns centre on the increasing fees charged by Spotlight, which both organisations set at around £200 annually. Paul W. Fleming, General Secretary of Equity, expressed that the union’s members perceive these fees as a “tax on hope,” as actors often feel compelled to maintain their Spotlight membership for career advancement.
“We have received consistent feedback from our members about the burden of these fees,” Fleming stated. “Our understanding was that Spotlight’s pricing should reflect operational costs without generating profit.”
In response, Spotlight’s Managing Director, Matt Hood, clarified the directory’s role, asserting, “We are not an agency. Our service is purely promotional, helping actors to be seen by industry professionals.” He emphasised that the directory’s purpose has remained unchanged for nearly a century.
Legal Battles and Future Implications
The legal confrontation escalated when Equity initiated a high court action in January 2025, arguing that Spotlight should be reclassified as an employment agency rather than a mere advertising platform. The union’s aim is to limit Spotlight’s ability to profit from its services, ensuring that subscription fees would cover only necessary operational expenses.
In September 2025, the high court ruled against Equity, stating that Spotlight functions primarily as a marketing tool and does not directly facilitate employment. Judge Catherine Howells described the ruling as a setback for Equity, labelling it an “embarrassing blow.”
Despite this, Equity has been granted the opportunity to appeal, with a court date set for late November. Fleming remains optimistic, stating, “We are not seeking to dismantle Spotlight. Our goal is to protect our members and address their concerns regarding exploitation.”
Spotlight’s Future and Industry Reactions
As the legal battle continues, Hood is keen to shift focus towards Spotlight’s centenary celebrations next year. He reiterated the company’s commitment to sustaining a modest profit while reinvesting in its services. Spotlight reported a turnover of £14 million in 2024, reflecting a 6.6% increase from the previous year.
“We prefer dialogue over litigation,” Hood remarked. “Our aim is to resolve these issues amicably for the benefit of actors.”
Why it Matters
This legal dispute between Equity and Spotlight underscores a broader concern about the financial pressures facing performers in the UK. As the industry evolves, the outcome of this case could have lasting implications for how casting services operate and how actors are supported in their careers. With many relying on Spotlight to connect with opportunities, the resolution of this conflict is vital for the future of the acting profession in Britain.
