**
In a significant development regarding the ongoing fallout from the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie has disclosed that he has identified six additional individuals who may be implicated in the unredacted Epstein files. After a recent viewing of these documents at the Department of Justice (DoJ), Massie hinted at the possibility of revealing their identities under congressional privilege if the DoJ continues to withhold this information from the public.
New Revelations from the Epstein Files
On 9 February 2026, Massie emerged from the DoJ offices in Washington, D.C., after spending approximately two hours sifting through the unredacted files concerning the disgraced financier. He asserted that the names of six men, including at least one American, a foreign national, and a person described as “high up in a foreign government,” were likely “incriminated” within the documents. “What I saw that bothered me were the names of at least six men that have been redacted that are likely incriminated by their inclusion in these files,” Massie stated, emphasising the potential implications of this information.
Massie is the lead sponsor of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which previously compelled the Trump administration to release a substantial cache of documents detailing the connections and activities surrounding Epstein. This legislation underlines the importance of transparency in a case that has ensnared numerous high-profile individuals and raised questions about accountability at the highest levels of government.
Bipartisan Concerns Over Redactions
The controversy surrounding the Epstein files has not been limited to Republicans. A group of Democrats who also reviewed the documents expressed their alarm at the extent of redactions, which they suggest may conceal critical information. Representative Jamie Raskin, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, accused the DoJ of engaging in a cover-up, asserting, “I was able to determine, at least I believe, that there were tons of completely unnecessary redactions.” He further noted that approximately three million documents related to the Epstein case remain unreleased, despite claims from the DoJ that its review is complete.
Massie and fellow Democrat Ro Khanna, who co-sponsored the transparency act, have both voiced their frustration over the excessive redactions. Massie called for the DoJ to reconsider its decision to redact the names, stating, “There is no reason in our legislation that allows them to redact the names of those men.” He suggested that unredacting the names would be the most prudent approach for the DoJ.
Calls for Accountability Amidst Growing Controversy
As calls for transparency mount, the spotlight has also turned towards Howard Lutnick, the U.S. Commerce Secretary, whose previously undisclosed ties to Epstein have raised eyebrows. Documents reveal communication between Lutnick and Epstein dating back to 2012, including travel arrangements to Epstein’s private island. Lutnick has denied any wrongdoing, claiming he spent “zero time” with Epstein. However, Massie has insisted that Lutnick “has a lot to answer for” and should resign.
Khanna echoed this sentiment, remarking on the political ramifications of the Epstein scandal in the UK, where it has already led to resignations including that of former British ambassador to the U.S., Peter Mandelson. He emphasised the need for accountability, stating, “Based on the evidence, [Lutnick] should be out of the cabinet.”
In a related development, Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s convicted co-conspirator, declined to testify before a House oversight committee investigating the case. Maxwell invoked her constitutional right against self-incrimination, despite having previously indicated a willingness to speak with Trump’s deputy attorney general.
Why it Matters
The implications of Massie’s claims and the ongoing struggle for transparency in the Epstein case are profound. As new names surface, the potential for accountability among powerful individuals grows, challenging the status quo of silence and impunity that has long surrounded this scandal. The bipartisan calls for action signal a collective recognition that the Epstein affair is not merely a relic of the past, but an ongoing issue that reflects deeper societal concerns about justice, power, and the protection of victims. As these discussions unfold, the political landscape will continue to be shaped by the quest for truth and transparency in the face of overwhelming evidence suggesting that many more individuals may have been complicit in Epstein’s crimes.
