The revival of Britain’s manufacturing industry hinges on a fundamental shift in how society perceives labour. Jill Fitzgerald-O’Connor argues that in order to rejuvenate this vital sector, we must move away from the outdated belief that intellectual work is inherently superior to manual skills. With government intervention necessary to support production, the time for action is now.
A Shift in Perspective
In her letter responding to Larry Elliott’s recent article on Britain’s manufacturing challenges, Fitzgerald-O’Connor emphasises the need for a profound change in attitudes towards vocational education. She highlights that, historically, courses focused on technical skills have often been viewed as a secondary option rather than a primary pathway for students. This perception must change.
Fitzgerald-O’Connor reflects on her own experience as a designer-pattern cutter, noting that opportunities for hands-on learning in factories have drastically diminished for aspiring fashion students. “Part of my training involved a placement in a factory, an experience now rarely available,” she points out, underlining the importance of practical experience in shaping skilled workers.
The Need for Government Support
The 1980s saw the introduction of the Enterprise Allowance Scheme, which aimed to stimulate innovation. However, Fitzgerald-O’Connor argues that the government failed to provide necessary follow-up support for production. Entrepreneurs seeking to expand their businesses were often left with no option but to rely on personal loans secured against their homes, which posed significant risks.
She recounts her own ambitions to participate in a trade mission to Germany to pursue export opportunities for her unique products, only to be told her business was too small to warrant consideration. Despite having a quality offering that resonated with foreign visitors, she found herself constrained by the limitations of her business size. “Increasing domestic sales indicated that I had the right product, but the margins would never yield the amount of investment needed,” she laments.
The Global Example: France
Interestingly, Fitzgerald-O’Connor draws a parallel with France, where President Emmanuel Macron is actively promoting the “Made in France” initiative. This campaign not only celebrates domestic craftsmanship but also serves to bolster the national economy. Such examples underscore the potential benefits of a robust, government-led support system for local production.
The contrast with the British approach is stark; while France invests in its manufacturing identity, the UK seems to falter in its commitment to fostering homegrown industries. Without a concerted push from policymakers, the manufacturing sector risks falling further behind.
A Call to Action
Fitzgerald-O’Connor’s message is clear: the time for government action is now, before it’s too late. A renewed focus on vocational education and supportive policies for burgeoning businesses could catalyse a manufacturing renaissance in the UK. Encouraging a shift in mindset will not only benefit the economy but also restore pride in skilled trades that have long been undervalued.
Why it Matters
The future of Britain’s manufacturing industry is at a critical juncture. As the global economy shifts and new technologies emerge, fostering a culture that values both manual and intellectual labour is essential for sustainable growth. By embracing this duality and committing to robust support for domestic production, the UK can reclaim its standing in the global market, ensuring that skilled workers are not only valued but also empowered to thrive. The time for a change in attitude and policy is now—before the opportunity slips away entirely.
