**
Newly released documents reveal troubling connections between David Stern, a former aide to Prince Andrew, and Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier. According to these files, Stern allegedly counseled Epstein on how to obscure his past criminal history when applying for a visa to China, raising serious questions about the integrity of those involved and their potential complicity in illegal activities.
Epstein’s Visa Application Controversy
The release of documents from the US Department of Justice has cast a shadow over David Stern, who was closely associated with both Epstein and Prince Andrew. In 2012, after Epstein’s visa application to China was initially denied, Stern purportedly advised Epstein’s assistant to omit any mention of previous denials or criminal charges from the application. In an email, Stern noted, “Whether or not to do this should be J’s decision of course and not mine,” indicating an awareness of the dubious nature of the advice.
Epstein had previously served an 18-month prison sentence in 2008 after pleading guilty to soliciting minors for sex, a conviction that would have made him ineligible for a visa in many jurisdictions. Although it remains unclear whether the former prince was aware of Stern’s guidance, there is no indication that Epstein ever followed through with the planned trip to Beijing.
Stern’s Ties to Epstein and Prince Andrew
David Stern, who has been described as a “fixer” for Prince Andrew since around 2010, held a directorial position in the Pitch@Palace initiative from 2016 to 2019. His relationship with Epstein was notably close; Stern once referred to him as a mentor. Notably, in an email exchange from 2011, Stern proposed establishing an investment office in Beijing that would cater to high-net-worth individuals, suggesting they could leverage Epstein’s “aura and access” for business opportunities.
While it is uncertain whether this venture ever materialised, further correspondence from 2012 indicates that Stern and Epstein continued to plot potential business collaborations in Asia. Stern suggested two options for forming a new company: the “Serpentine Group” or using his existing firm, Asia Gateway, which had a track record with clients in the region. Epstein gave his approval to proceed with Asia Gateway.
Ongoing Investigations
The ramifications of these revelations extend beyond mere associations. Thames Valley Police are currently reviewing the Epstein files to investigate claims of “misconduct in public office” involving Prince Andrew. Allegations suggest that he may have leaked confidential information related to his role as a government trade envoy, which raises significant ethical and legal concerns.
Both Prince Andrew and Stern have been approached for comments but have thus far refrained from addressing the allegations directly. Additionally, former British ambassador to the US, Peter Mandelson, is also under scrutiny for similar allegations linked to the same inquiry.
Why it Matters
These developments are not merely scandalous; they highlight the potential complicity of high-profile individuals in serious criminal activities. The implications of such connections are vast, affecting public trust in the monarchy and leading to calls for greater transparency and accountability among those in positions of power. As investigations continue, the outcomes may set important precedents regarding the conduct of public figures and their associates, especially in cases involving serious moral and legal transgressions.
