**
In a bid to navigate a path towards peace, senior officials from Ukraine and Russia are scheduled to convene this week in Switzerland for a second round of negotiations, marking a significant moment as the fourth anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion approaches. The discussions, facilitated by the Trump administration, are set to begin on Tuesday and will follow a similar format to the previous talks held earlier this month in Abu Dhabi. However, optimism for a meaningful resolution appears dim, with Russia maintaining its stringent demands.
Stakes High as Talks Commence
The upcoming two-day meeting in Geneva represents a pivotal opportunity for both sides to engage in dialogue amid an ongoing conflict that has devastated Ukraine and strained international relations. The talks will include representatives from Washington, Kyiv, and Moscow, yet the prevailing sentiment is one of scepticism regarding the potential for any significant breakthrough.
Russian spokesperson Dmitry Peskov has indicated that the Geneva discussions will cover a wider array of topics than the military ceasefire proposals that dominated previous conversations. Notably, Vladimir Medinsky, a staunch ally of President Putin and a known sceptic of Ukrainian sovereignty, will lead the Russian delegation, which includes key military and diplomatic figures. Conversely, Ukraine’s team will be guided by Rustem Umerov, the secretary of the national security and defence council.
A Shift to European Ground
This round of talks marks the first instance of negotiations taking place on European soil, following previous meetings in Abu Dhabi and Istanbul. The decision to hold the discussions in Switzerland appears to have been influenced by the United States, with Trump envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner also present in Geneva for separate discussions with Iranian officials.
As the war’s anniversary looms, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has reiterated Ukraine’s firm stance against ceding any territory, particularly in the contested Donbas region. Drawing parallels with past Russian aggressions in Chechnya and Crimea, Zelenskyy has warned that yielding to Moscow’s demands would set a perilous precedent.
Diverging Views on Ceasefire and Elections
While Trump’s recent comments suggested that Zelenskyy must take action to facilitate peace talks, his Secretary of State Marco Rubio conveyed a more cautious outlook regarding Russia’s intentions. Ahead of the negotiations, Zelenskyy emphasised that Ukraine would not compromise on its territorial integrity and expressed concerns over the potential fallout from holding presidential elections under the current circumstances.
Experts, including Olexiy Haran from the Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, have voiced strong opposition to US-Russian pressure for Ukraine to conduct elections while the war is ongoing. Haran highlighted the impracticality of such a move, citing the lack of secure conditions necessary for a legitimate electoral process.
A Complex Path Forward
As the Ukrainian delegation prepares to engage in discussions, the focus remains on ensuring that the interests of Ukraine are safeguarded. The backdrop of history looms large, particularly with the involvement of figures like Medinsky, whose previous writings have questioned Ukraine’s sovereignty. The current atmosphere suggests that the Kremlin may not be approaching these talks with genuine intent for resolution.
Zelenskyy’s statement regarding the heavy toll on Russian forces—estimated between 30,000 to 35,000 casualties monthly—illustrates the high costs of the conflict for all parties involved. With Ukraine determined not to repeat the mistakes of the past, the upcoming talks may serve more as a platform for asserting national resilience than as a harbinger of peace.
Why it Matters
The outcome of these negotiations will have profound implications not only for Ukraine and Russia but also for the broader geopolitical landscape. As both sides grapple with entrenched positions, the potential for renewed hostilities remains a pressing concern. Amidst the backdrop of an ongoing war, the international community watches closely, aware that any misstep could lead to further escalation and suffering. The stakes have never been higher, and the need for a durable peace is more urgent than ever.
