**
In a shocking turn of events, Labour minister Josh Simons has been accused of launching a covert smear campaign against journalists, falsely linking them to pro-Kremlin activities. Internal emails reveal Simons not only pressed British intelligence officials to investigate reporters but also provided them with dubious claims about their alleged connections to Russian propaganda. This troubling development has led to widespread condemnation and raised serious questions about the integrity of Labour Together, the think tank Simons formerly led.
Unmasking the Allegations
The controversy stems from a series of emails sent by Simons and his chief of staff to the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) in early 2024. These communications aimed to discredit a Sunday Times article that reported on Labour Together’s failure to disclose significant political donations. In these emails, Simons named specific journalists, including Gabriel Pogrund and Harry Yorke, while suggesting their reporting could be part of a coordinated effort to undermine Labour’s leadership, notably Keir Starmer.
Simons’ spokesperson has vehemently denied the allegations, insisting that claims linking the journalists to Russian intelligence are unfounded. However, the evidence suggests a deliberate effort to malign the reputations of those who investigated Labour Together’s financial practices.
A Disturbing Investigation
The emails reveal that Simons hired APCO Worldwide, a lobbying firm, to delve into the origins of the Sunday Times story. The contract, valued at £36,000, stipulated that the firm would provide narratives to counteract any negative press. However, weeks after receiving APCO’s report, which contained unnecessary personal information about journalists, Simons proceeded to share their names with the NCSC, framing them as potential threats to national security.
Among the claims made in these emails was the assertion that Paul Holden, a freelance journalist credited in the Sunday Times report, was living with the daughter of a former Labour adviser suspected of having connections to Russian intelligence. Although these details were never publicly known at the time, they were presented to intelligence officials as evidence of a pro-Kremlin conspiracy.
The Fallout from the Emails
The fallout has been swift. Simons is now under investigation by the Cabinet Office’s propriety and ethics team, scrutinising his role in commissioning the report and sharing it with security services. Critics have labelled his actions as “McCarthyite,” suggesting that they echo the infamous witch hunts of the 1950s in America, where individuals were unjustly accused of communist affiliations.
Holden, who has faced threats during his investigations into Russian oligarchs, expressed his horror at the situation, stating that the allegations against him are not only baseless but also deeply violating. His partner, Jessica Murray, echoed his sentiments, describing the invasion of their privacy as “disturbing, creepy, and deplorable.”
Labour’s Integrity on Trial
As the scandal unfolds, party leaders have come under increasing pressure to address the implications of Simons’ actions. The allegations have sparked a broader conversation about the degree to which political entities are willing to go to suppress dissenting voices and control narratives, particularly in the lead-up to a general election.
Despite NCSC’s assessment that there was no basis for an investigation into the claims made by Labour Together, Simons has continued to push the narrative that journalists are somehow complicit in a foreign campaign against the party. This stance has left many questioning the motivations behind Labour’s internal investigations and whether they serve to protect political interests rather than uphold journalistic integrity.
Why it Matters
This incident reveals a troubling trend within political circles where allegations of foreign interference are wielded as weapons against the press, raising alarms about press freedom and the right to investigate public figures. The implications for democracy are profound; if political operatives can manipulate intelligence channels to undermine journalists, the very foundation of a free and open society is at risk. As this story develops, the need for transparency and accountability in political communications has never been more critical.