In a concerning development for migrant families across the UK, proposed changes to immigration policy could force many to relinquish essential in-work benefits to avoid prolonged waits for settled status. The ramifications of these potential reforms, spearheaded by Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, could exacerbate financial insecurity and deepen child poverty among vulnerable communities.
Proposed Changes to Immigration Policy
Under the new proposals, which are set to come into effect as early as April, the waiting period for migrants to achieve settled status could double from ten to twenty years if they have accessed public funds, even while employed. Currently, more than 200,000 individuals living legally in the UK are navigating the 10-year route to indefinite leave to remain (ILR), a process that necessitates multiple visa renewals at significant financial cost—over £3,900 per renewal, inclusive of healthcare charges.
The proposed shift has raised alarms among advocates and experts, who warn that it could lead to further marginalisation of already vulnerable groups. Nick Beales, head of campaigning at the migration charity Ramfel, highlighted the dire consequences of such policies, stating, “Parents may find themselves working upwards of 80 hours a week, which will only serve to worsen child poverty. This approach is not only cruel but fundamentally undermines the future of British children from migrant backgrounds.”
Families at Risk of Hardship
Research conducted by Ramfel points to alarming trends among families who rely on public funds. Many parents expressed that they would feel compelled to forgo essential benefits such as child benefit, universal credit, and disability allowances to avoid the punitive consequences of these policy changes. One anonymous parent articulated the overwhelming stress of the situation: “It’s as if we are being forced to choose between our right to settle and our very survival. The system is broken and punitive.”
The proposed changes threaten to create a two-tier system that disproportionately affects Black and Asian families, who make up a significant portion of those on the current 10-year route. As the government pushes for what it terms an “earned settlement model,” the path to security becomes increasingly fraught with obstacles, particularly for those needing support.
Voices of the Affected
In a survey conducted by Ramfel, 68 parents from diverse backgrounds, including West African, South Asian, and Caribbean communities, shared their experiences. A staggering 90% of respondents using public funds indicated they would be willing to relinquish these benefits to avoid penalties, despite the looming threats of homelessness and debt. Julia, a carer and mother of three, exemplified this struggle. Approaching her qualification for ILR, she cancelled all benefits she was entitled to, fearing that any reliance on support would result in a 20-year extension of her wait for status.
The emotional toll of these decisions is profound. Julia stated, “I’ve had to stop claiming benefits, even though I desperately need them. It feels so unfair that my need for support is being used against me.”
The Wider Impact
The proposals have sparked significant backlash from advocacy groups and organisations such as AdviceUK, which argue that they will only deepen existing inequalities within migrant communities. They contend that the government’s plan for a “fairer pathway to settlement” has done anything but promote justice, instead instilling fear and insecurity among those striving to contribute to society.
During the launch of the consultation in November, Mahmood asserted the government’s commitment to building a diverse and pluralistic society, emphasising that permanent residency should be viewed as a privilege to be earned through contributions to the community. However, critics argue that this perspective overlooks the fundamental rights of families already living in the UK and the contributions they make to the economy and society.
Why it Matters
The proposed immigration reforms represent a significant threat to the welfare of migrant families, potentially forcing them into a cycle of poverty and insecurity. By imposing harsh conditions on access to settled status, the government risks not only the futures of these families but also the broader societal fabric of inclusivity and equity. As the dialogue around immigration continues, it is imperative that policymakers recognise the human impact of their decisions and work towards a system that supports rather than punishes.
