Conservative Donor Rami Ranger Sparks Controversy with £50,000 Dinner Bid for Kemi Badenoch

David Chen, Westminster Correspondent
5 Min Read
⏱️ 3 min read

Rami Ranger, a Conservative donor who faced suspension in 2023 over allegations of bullying and inappropriate remarks, has ignited fresh outrage within the party after successfully bidding £50,000 for a dinner with Minister Kemi Badenoch. His re-emergence at a high-profile fundraising event raises questions about the party’s standards and its financial dependencies.

A Thorny Return to the Fold

Ranger, a member of the House of Lords and a significant financial backer of the Conservative Party, has been under scrutiny since his suspension in September 2023. This followed serious complaints regarding his conduct, particularly concerning derogatory comments made towards a freelance journalist and remarks about the Pakistani community. Despite these controversies, he was quietly reinstated in November 2024, although he subsequently lost his CBE.

The dinner, held at the luxurious Peninsula hotel in central London, was part of a 1920s-themed charity evening which reportedly raised £220,000 for the party. Ranger’s bid was the highest of the night, outpacing offers for other exclusive lots, including a lunch with Jacob Rees-Mogg and a shooting trip with James Cleverly.

Party Backlash and Divided Opinions

Ranger’s return to the Conservative fold has not been met with universal approval. Some party members are expressing indignation, arguing that his readmission underscores a troubling desperation for funds within the party. One donor remarked, “The rehabilitation of Rami Ranger just shows how desperate this Tory party is for money from anywhere.”

Party Backlash and Divided Opinions

The controversy surrounding Ranger intensified after it was revealed that he had made a series of derogatory comments on social media about journalist Poonam Joshi. His behaviour was deemed abusive and demeaning by the Lords commissioner for standards, although he avoided suspension after agreeing to partake in social media training.

Joshi has voiced her dismay at the party’s decision to accept Ranger back, labelling it “appalling and totally unethical.” She emphasised that it reflects poorly on the Conservative Party’s commitment to maintaining ethical standards.

The Financial Landscape of the Conservatives

The Conservatives have recently been grappling with financial challenges, which may explain their willingness to overlook Ranger’s past transgressions. Having donated over £1.5 million to the party since 2009, Ranger’s financial contributions are significant in a climate where parties are increasingly reliant on wealthy donors. His £5,000 donation during his suspension indicates his ongoing financial engagement, despite the controversies surrounding him.

This reliance on affluent supporters can lead to ethical quandaries, particularly when individuals with questionable pasts are welcomed back into the fold in exchange for financial backing.

A Shift in Party Dynamics

The decision to reintegrate Ranger reflects a broader shift in the Conservative Party’s dynamics and priorities. Once focused on high standards of conduct, the party now seems willing to compromise on principles to secure funding. The implications of this shift could reverberate beyond individual cases, affecting the party’s reputation and its relationship with constituents.

A Shift in Party Dynamics

Ranger’s successful dinner bid and the ensuing backlash illustrate the tension between financial necessity and ethical integrity. With the Conservative Party facing a challenging political landscape, how it navigates these dilemmas will be crucial in defining its future.

Why it Matters

The return of Rami Ranger to the Conservative Party spotlight is emblematic of a larger issue within political circles: the balance between financial support and ethical accountability. As the party grapples with its identity and public perception, the acceptance of controversial figures like Ranger could erode trust among voters and signal a troubling prioritisation of fundraising over principles. This incident serves as a reminder that the integrity of political institutions relies heavily on the actions and decisions of their members.

Share This Article
David Chen is a seasoned Westminster correspondent with 12 years of experience navigating the corridors of power. He has covered four general elections, two prime ministerial resignations, and countless parliamentary debates. Known for his sharp analysis and extensive network of political sources, he previously reported for Sky News and The Independent.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2026 The Update Desk. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy