Former Prime Minister Boris Johnson has urged the UK and its allies to deploy non-combat troops to Ukraine immediately, suggesting that such a move could alter Russian President Vladimir Putin’s approach to the ongoing war. Speaking in an exclusive interview on BBC’s *Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg*, Johnson, alongside former military chief Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, argued that sending troops to peaceful regions would demonstrate solidarity with Ukraine.
The Case for Immediate Deployment
Johnson’s remarks come just days before the fourth anniversary of Russia’s invasion, a conflict he believes could have been averted had Western nations responded more decisively to Putin’s earlier aggressions. He questioned the rationale behind waiting for a ceasefire to send troops when a proactive stance could signal commitment to Ukraine’s sovereignty.
“If we can have a plan for boots on the ground after the war, why not do it now?” Johnson asserted, pointing out that the presence of international forces could act as a stabilising force in the region. He emphasised that these troops would not engage in combat but instead serve to bolster Ukraine’s independence and security.
Criticism of Western Caution
Both Johnson and Sir Tony expressed frustration over the Western allies’ slow response during the war. They noted that the delivery of military aid to Ukraine has often been delayed, with lengthy discussions preventing timely support. Sir Tony described this approach as “incrementalism,” which he believes has left Ukraine feeling unsupported in crucial moments.
Johnson lamented, “We’ve always delayed needlessly… the one person who suffers from escalation is Putin.” He argued that a firmer stance against Putin’s aggression could have changed the course of events significantly.
Government Response and Current Military Support
In response to Johnson’s call, Defence Secretary John Healey reiterated the UK’s commitment to sending troops, but only once a peace agreement is in place. He expressed a desire to be the Defence Secretary who oversees British troops’ deployment to Ukraine, signalling a hopeful end to the conflict. Healey highlighted the UK’s substantial military aid to Ukraine, including a recent £500 million air defence package.
A spokesperson for the Ministry of Defence underscored the UK’s leadership role in supporting Ukraine, stating, “We are proud of UK leadership on Ukraine – supporting the fight today and working to secure the peace tomorrow.”
Historical Context and the Path Forward
Reflecting on the past, Johnson expressed regret that the West’s failure to confront Putin’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 was a pivotal moment that emboldened the Russian leader. He linked this inaction to a broader pattern of negligence in Western foreign policy, suggesting that a lack of clarity and resolve has permitted Putin to continue his aggressive policies.
“There’s a fundamental lack of resolve,” he stated, stressing that until the West clearly communicates its commitment to Ukraine’s independence, the conflict will likely persist.
Why it Matters
As the war in Ukraine drags on, Johnson’s proposal to send non-combat troops could represent a significant shift in Western policy, potentially altering the dynamics of the conflict. His insistence on immediate action reflects a growing frustration among some leaders regarding the pace of international support for Ukraine. As discussions about troop deployments unfold, the implications for Ukraine’s future and the West’s role in ensuring its sovereignty hang in the balance.