Public consultations are currently being held regarding a proposed all-season resort in Alberta’s Kananaskis Country, stirring up both excitement and apprehension among local communities. Announced in December by the provincial government, the initiative aims to establish three new all-season resorts — Castle, Fortress, and Nakiska. Officials claim the development will generate thousands of jobs and inject billions into the local economy. However, the project has sparked significant debate over its potential environmental implications.
New Developments on the Horizon
The planned all-season resorts mark a significant step for Alberta, representing the first such resorts on provincial lands. The transformation of Fortress Mountain, a former ski area located approximately 125 kilometres west of Calgary, is at the forefront of this venture. Once a bustling ski destination, Fortress Mountain ceased operations in 2004 and now only offers snowcat skiing.
The revitalisation plan includes constructing hotels, gondola systems, extensive trail networks, and opportunities for private real estate sales. Proponents of the project, including David McKenna of Ridge North America, assert that the resort will create over 1,000 jobs. “We are keen to understand what Albertans want to see included in this project, and what they would prefer to avoid,” McKenna stated during an open house held at Calgary’s Mount Royal University.
Community Concerns and Environmental Impact
Despite the perceived economic benefits, there are significant concerns regarding the ecological consequences of developing an all-season resort in such a sensitive area. Critics argue that the environmental assessment conducted is inadequate, leaving many questions unanswered. Gareth Thomson, representing the Biosphere Institute of the Bow Valley, emphasised the need for a more thorough evaluation. “We cannot support the development as it stands, particularly given that Kananaskis Country already attracts 5 million visitors annually—surpassing even Banff National Park,” he remarked.
The impact on local wildlife cannot be understated. Chloe Hahn from the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society highlighted that the proposed site overlaps with critical habitats for several species, including grizzly bears and wolverines, as well as threatened bull trout. “This is a vital area for these species, and further development could disrupt their habitats,” she cautioned.
Next Steps in the Consultation Process
The next public consultation is set for February 23 in Edmonton, where stakeholders and community members will have another opportunity to voice their opinions on the future of Kananaskis Country. As discussions continue, it remains to be seen whether the government will address the environmental concerns raised or push forward with the development plans as initially proposed.
Why it Matters
The proposed all-season resort in Alberta’s Kananaskis Country encapsulates the ongoing struggle between economic growth and environmental preservation. As communities weigh the potential benefits against the ecological risks, the outcome of this project could set a significant precedent for future developments in Canada’s natural landscapes. Balancing tourism and conservation will be crucial, not only for the preservation of Alberta’s unique ecosystems but also for the sustainability of its local economies. As the conversation unfolds, the stakes for both the environment and the community’s economic future remain high.
