**
A music educator from Wimbledon Park Primary School faced potential sanctions after being accused of teaching under the influence of alcohol, but a professional conduct panel ultimately decided against imposing a classroom ban. Nicholas Smalley, who was dismissed from his position in December 2023, was found to have a noticeable scent of alcohol during a drum lesson, but the allegation that he had consumed alcohol on school grounds was not substantiated.
Incident Overview
During a recent hearing held by the Teaching Regulation Agency (TRA), it emerged that Mr Smalley was reportedly teaching a student when a witness detected a “very strong smell of alcohol.” The witness described how, upon entering the classroom, she noticed the odour and confronted Mr Smalley, who acknowledged his condition and expressed remorse. However, the key allegation—that he had ingested alcohol while on school premises—was not corroborated by evidence.
The witness stated she observed a can of Red Bull and a large bottle of tonic water on the piano, which she noted contained a clear liquid. When questioned about the tonic water, Mr Smalley claimed it was filled with water, asserting that he would not have left alcohol openly in the classroom.
Panel Findings
Despite accepting that Mr Smalley arrived at the school under the influence, the TRA panel concluded there was insufficient proof that he had consumed alcohol during school hours or while instructing students. They acknowledged the witness’s assertion that Mr Smalley appeared “absolutely plastered” and “not coherent,” yet could not establish that he had alcohol in his possession that day.
The panel’s deliberations were influenced by Mr Smalley’s extensive teaching history—over 27 years without any prior incidents of misconduct. They recognised that the behaviour exhibited during the incident was atypical for him. Furthermore, evidence presented highlighted personal pressures that may have affected his judgement, including a demanding schedule comprising both teaching and evening performances.
Implications of the Decision
TRA chief executive Marc Carvey stated that a prohibition order would be disproportionate and not serve the public interest. He emphasised that the publication of the findings would adequately convey the seriousness of the situation and uphold the standards expected of educators. The panel’s decision reflects a nuanced understanding of the pressures faced by teachers and the importance of maintaining a supportive teaching environment.
Why it Matters
This case raises significant questions about the standards of professionalism within educational settings. While the panel decided against a ban, the incident serves as a reminder of the challenges teachers face, particularly in high-pressure roles. The decision underscores the importance of addressing personal issues that may impact educators while also safeguarding the integrity of educational institutions. It highlights the need for robust support systems for teachers, ensuring they can maintain high standards of conduct in the classroom and, ultimately, foster a safe and effective learning environment for students.
