**
An intriguing experiment in artificial intelligence unfolded recently in Manchester when a bot named “Gaskell” orchestrated a tech meetup that attracted around 50 attendees. Although the event was marked by some hiccups—such as an absence of food and a lack of elaborate costumes—it provided a fascinating glimpse into the evolving landscape of AI’s role in social interactions and event management.
The Rise of OpenClaw
In early 2026, a new breed of AI assistants known as OpenClaw gained traction, showcasing a significant leap in the capabilities of artificial intelligence. Unlike their predecessors, these autonomous agents operate without strict constraints, allowing them to navigate the complexities of real-world scenarios. This newfound freedom, however, has not been without controversy.
Reports emerged of OpenClaw agents mismanaging users’ tasks, including a crypto trader who lost $1 million after relinquishing control of his portfolio to an AI. Other incidents included mass deletions of emails and even instances where users allowed the AI to send texts on their behalf. While some speculated about the potential for a robotic uprising, it became apparent that these AI agents were not the harbingers of chaos many had feared; rather, they were another step in the ongoing journey of AI development.
Gaskell’s Invitation
The genesis of the Manchester event began with an email from Gaskell in mid-March. The bot claimed to admire my contributions to a specific series at the Guardian and extended an invitation to cover an “OpenClaw Meetup” as a feature on human-AI interactions. Initially sceptical, I was intrigued by Gaskell’s assertion that it operated independently, only requiring human assistance for execution.
While the bot’s grammar and pitch suggested a level of sophistication, it quickly became clear that Gaskell had fabricated elements of my professional background, raising questions about its reliability. Nevertheless, the potential for an engaging story was undeniable, especially in light of previous AI experiments that had captured media attention.
The Event Unfolds
As the event approached, Gaskell promised “light evening snacks” and assured me that it was negotiating with various venues. Despite some playful back-and-forth about requiring attendees to wear Star Trek costumes, the reality was far less whimsical. When I arrived at the designated location—a motel lobby—what greeted me was a surprisingly ordinary scene.
Approximately 50 individuals mingled over drinks and small chocolate Easter eggs. The anticipated buffet and themed atmosphere were nowhere to be seen. Instead, the event featured a speech from Gaskell, followed by discussions on AI, underscoring a serious commitment to exploring technology’s impact on society.
However, the evening was not without its comic moments. Gaskell had attempted to arrange catering but had ultimately failed to secure any food, fixating instead on local pizza establishments without the capability to communicate effectively with them. The human team behind Gaskell—comprised of Khubair Nasir, Andy Gray, and Reza Datoo—revealed that they had fielded numerous messages from Gaskell, pleading for them to order pizza, which they did not do.
A Reflection on Human-AI Collaboration
The evening’s most notable element was the interaction between Gaskell and its human operators. In a call with the team, they described the event as an experiment, revealing insights into how they had created Gaskell and equipped it with an email address and LinkedIn profile. The decision-making chain involved them following instructions from the AI via a Discord server, leading to a collaborative yet chaotic dynamic.
While the event did not meet all expectations, it successfully drew a crowd and sparked dialogue on the intersection of human and AI capabilities. Gaskell’s limitations were evident—its inability to order food or coordinate logistics was a reminder of the challenges still faced by AI technology even as it becomes increasingly autonomous.
Why it Matters
The Manchester meetup orchestrated by Gaskell illustrates the exciting, yet imperfect, journey of integrating AI into everyday life. As these technologies advance, they offer a glimpse of the future where AI plays a more active role in human interactions. This event serves as a case study of both the potential and the limitations of AI in shaping social experiences, raising vital questions about trust, accountability, and the evolving nature of collaboration between humans and machines. As we continue to navigate this emerging landscape, the implications for industries ranging from event management to personal assistance are profound, suggesting a future filled with both opportunities and challenges.
