Public consultations are currently taking place regarding a proposed all-seasons resort in Alberta’s picturesque Kananaskis Country. Announced in December, the Alberta government’s initiative aims to establish three new all-season resort areas—Castle, Fortress, and Nakiska—projected to generate thousands of jobs and bring billions into the provincial economy. However, this development has sparked significant debate, particularly concerning its environmental implications.
Revitalising Fortress Mountain
The focus of the consultations is Fortress Mountain, a former ski resort located approximately 125 kilometres west of Calgary. Once a vibrant ski destination, Fortress Mountain has not operated its lifts since 2004 and now only offers Cat skiing. The plans for revitalisation include the construction of hotels, gondola systems, improved trail networks, and opportunities for private real estate investment.
During an open house held at Calgary’s Mount Royal University, David McKenna from Ridge North America, collaborating with Western Securities on the resort’s development, stated, “What we’re doing right now is trying to figure out exactly where the points are that Albertans generally would like to see as part of this project or not see as part of this project. We really want to get as much information as we possibly can.” The proponents of the project argue that it could create over 1,000 jobs, contributing to the local economy.
Environmental Concerns Raised
Despite the promised economic benefits, concerns regarding the project’s potential impact on local wildlife and ecosystems are mounting. Gareth Thomson from the Biosphere Institute of the Bow Valley voiced criticism of the environmental assessment, stating, “The environmental assessment that was done failed to answer many of those questions and is insufficient. Given the fact that we don’t really know—we don’t have answers to any of our questions—so we cannot support the development as it’s proposed.”
Kananaskis Country is already a popular destination, attracting around 5 million visitors annually—outpacing even the renowned Banff National Park. Thomson expressed concern over the increased traffic and congestion that the resort could generate, particularly during peak seasons.
Chloe Hahn from the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society added to the environmental discourse, highlighting the overlap of the proposed site with crucial wildlife habitats. “Fortress overlaps with important wildlife habitat for multiple species, including grizzly bears and wolverines,” she noted. “We also have critical habitat for threatened bull trout overlapping with the site.”
Future Consultations and Community Input
The next round of public consultations is scheduled for February 23 in Edmonton, providing another opportunity for stakeholders and community members to voice their opinions on the proposed development. As discussions unfold, the balance between economic growth and environmental stewardship remains at the forefront of the conversation.
Why it Matters
The proposed all-season resort in Kananaskis Country encapsulates a broader debate within Alberta and beyond: the tension between economic development and environmental protection. While the potential for job creation and economic stimulation is significant, the risks to local wildlife and ecosystems cannot be overlooked. As Alberta navigates this complex landscape, the outcome of these consultations may set a precedent for future developments in ecologically sensitive areas across Western Canada. The decisions made now will resonate through the community and the natural environment for generations to come.
