Public consultations are currently taking place regarding a significant proposal to establish an all-seasons resort in Kananaskis Country, Alberta. Announced by the provincial government in December, the initiative aims to designate three areas—Castle, Fortress, and Nakiska—as all-season resorts, with the promise of creating thousands of jobs and generating billions in economic growth. However, this ambitious plan has raised concerns over its environmental impact and the potential disruption to local wildlife.
Revitalising Fortress Mountain
An open house event was held at Mount Royal University in Calgary on Friday, focusing on the proposed developments at Fortress Mountain, a site that once thrived as a ski destination before its lift operations ceased in 2004. Currently only offering Cat skiing, the plans for Fortress aim to breathe new life into the area, envisaging a series of hotels, gondolas, expansive trail networks, and private real estate developments.
David McKenna from Ridge North America, a key player in the resort’s development alongside Western Securities, emphasised the importance of gathering public feedback. “We’re trying to pinpoint what aspects Albertans would like to see included or excluded from this project, and we aim to collect as much information as possible,” he stated.
Economic Benefits vs. Environmental Concerns
The project proponents assert that the resort could create over 1,000 jobs, a significant boost to the local economy. However, opposition voices are growing louder, highlighting the potential negative repercussions on local ecosystems. Gareth Thomson from the Biosphere Institute of the Bow Valley expressed doubts about the adequacy of the environmental assessment conducted for the project. “The assessment failed to address many critical questions, leaving us unable to support the proposal in its current form,” he remarked.

Kananaskis Country already attracts around five million visitors annually—surpassing the traffic faced by Banff National Park—raising concerns about congestion and its effects on the area’s delicate environment. Thomson noted, “Just imagine the transportation issues and traffic jams during peak summer weekends.”
The overlap of the proposed resort with vital wildlife habitats has also drawn scrutiny. Chloe Hahn from the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society pointed out that the region is home to several species, including grizzly bears and wolverines, as well as critical habitats for threatened bull trout.
Ongoing Public Engagement
As the consultations continue, the next round is scheduled for February 23 in Edmonton, where stakeholders and residents will have another opportunity to voice their opinions. The outcome of these discussions could shape the future of Kananaskis Country and its ecological integrity.
The push for all-season resorts signals a broader trend in Alberta aimed at diversifying the province’s economic reliance on traditional resource sectors. However, this ambition must be balanced with a commitment to environmental conservation and the preservation of local ecosystems.
Why it Matters
The debate surrounding Alberta’s all-season resort proposal is emblematic of a larger conflict between development and conservation. As the province seeks to bolster its economy through tourism, the potential repercussions on wildlife and the environment are crucial considerations that cannot be overlooked. The outcome of this initiative will not only impact the local economy but will also set a precedent for future developments in ecologically sensitive areas across Canada.
