**
As Chancellor Rachel Reeves prepares to unveil her spring economic forecast on Tuesday, a coalition of prominent think tanks is urging her to reassess the role of the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR). With pressure mounting on Keir Starmer’s government following Labour’s recent by-election defeat to the Greens, these organisations contend that reforming the OBR is essential for fostering greater public investment and achieving sustainable economic growth.
Coalition of Think Tanks Push for Change
The call for reform comes from a diverse group of think tanks, including the Labour-aligned Progress, the left-leaning New Economics Foundation (NEF), Common Wealth, and the Women’s Budget Group. Together, they argue that the current economic framework is contributing to instability, short-term focus, and inadequate long-term investment.
Louisa Dollimore, director of strategy at the Good Growth Foundation, which coordinated the coalition, described the OBR as “a backseat driver with out-of-date maps,” emphasising that it hinders necessary long-term planning and investment in a crucial time for the UK economy. This sentiment is echoed by Hannah Peaker, deputy chief executive of NEF, who remarked on the detrimental effects of the OBR’s rigid frameworks on government decision-making.
Economic Context: A Nascent Recovery
In her upcoming forecast, Reeves is expected to highlight Labour’s efforts to restore fiscal stability, alongside signs of a budding economic recovery. This comes in the context of an economy still grappling with the aftershocks of recent crises and the need for robust policy responses. Nonetheless, the think tanks warn that the current oversight model may stifle innovative fiscal policies necessary for navigating these challenges.
Critics argue that the OBR’s framework encourages reactive rather than proactive economic governance. For instance, last year’s £5 billion welfare cuts were a response to perceived immediate fiscal pressures rather than a reflection of a coherent long-term strategy.
The Call for a New Fiscal Approach
Amidst these discussions, the Institute for Fiscal Studies has also advocated for a revision of the fiscal rules that currently govern economic policy. Economists contend that the OBR does not adequately factor in the long-term benefits of government investments, which can lead to hasty policy decisions that undermine economic growth.
Reeves has already taken steps to modify the fiscal rules, allowing for increased borrowing to fund investments and raising taxes to maintain public services. However, some MPs within the Labour Party remain concerned that the government is adopting an overly cautious stance regarding fiscal policy.
Historical Oversight and Future Directions
The OBR, established in 2010 by then-Chancellor George Osborne, was designed in an era of austerity. Adam Langleben, executive director of Progress, argues that while the OBR can effectively calculate the immediate costs of investments, it often overlooks their long-term value—such as improved health, housing, and transportation. He urges that the OBR’s assessments should serve to inform and inspire ambition rather than restrict it.
Former OBR directors Richard Hughes and Robert Chote have also weighed in, asserting that past administrations have consistently overspent and failed to anticipate economic challenges. Hughes noted that governments often face unexpected difficulties, which, if not properly accounted for, lead to an upward spiral in deficits.
Why it Matters
The debate over the OBR’s role reflects broader concerns about the UK’s economic strategy and the adequacy of its current policy framework. As Reeves prepares to deliver her spring forecast, the insistence from think tanks for reform signals a pivotal moment. The trajectory of the UK economy hinges on the ability to balance immediate fiscal responsibilities with the long-term vision necessary for sustainable growth. The decisions made in the coming weeks could dictate not only the Labour Party’s fortunes but also the economic wellbeing of the nation for years to come.
