More than 20 Labour MPs have united in a passionate plea for the government to urgently reform England’s student loan system, citing what they describe as “unfair” interest rates and repayment terms. During a debate in Westminster Hall, MP Jas Athwal articulated the need to raise the salary threshold for repayment and to drastically reduce interest rates, labelling the current framework a “debt trap” for graduates.
The Debt Trap Dilemma
The issue of student loans has been thrust into the limelight, particularly as Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch raised concerns during Prime Minister’s Questions. She described the present situation as a “debt trap” for students, underscoring the pressing need for interest rate reductions. In response, Sir Keir Starmer acknowledged the government’s commitment to exploring methods to create a fairer system, highlighting the growing discontent among graduates.
Currently, the interest rates for student loans in England vary significantly based on when students began their university education and the repayment plan they are on. For those beginning their studies in 2023 or later, the interest rate stands at 4.3%. In contrast, graduates on Plan 2, who initiated their studies between September 2012 and July 2023, face an interest rate that combines the Retail Price Index (RPI) rate, currently at 3.8%, with an additional charge of up to 3%, determined by their earnings.
Concerns from Labour MPs
The coalition government led by the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats introduced Plan 2 loans in 2012, at the same time tuition fees were raised to a staggering £9,000 per year. Since then, dissatisfaction has mounted, particularly after the recent announcement that the salary threshold for repayment would remain frozen for three years starting in April 2027. This freeze effectively places a heavier financial burden on graduates, forcing those who earn above the threshold into larger repayments than they would have faced had the threshold kept pace with inflation.

During the Westminster Hall debate, numerous Labour MPs voiced their frustrations, with Athwal stating the system is “in urgent need of reform” and that mere adjustments would not suffice. He noted that students begin accruing interest prior to graduation and that many find their loan balances increasing even while making repayments. Athwal pointed out that middle-income earners bear the brunt of this system, as they are less able to pay off their loans quickly compared to higher earners.
Real Stories of Student Debt
The impact of this system is not just theoretical. Labour MP Luke Charters, who carries a Plan 2 loan himself, described the system as “a dog’s dinner.” Another graduate, Chris Hinchliff, labelled the freeze on repayment thresholds a “misstep” and urged the government to confront the issue before the next general election. Kate Osborne, representing Jarrow and Gateshead East, revealed she has been inundated with distressing accounts from over 700 constituents facing overwhelming student debt. Some reported owing as much as £60,000, with their total debt escalating by tens of thousands of pounds despite being employed full-time.
Bell Ribeiro-Addy, the Labour MP for Clapham and Brixton Hill, went so far as to compare the terms of student loans to those of predatory lenders, emphasising the need for drastic change. Several MPs echoed calls for the abolition of tuition fees entirely, arguing that such a move would enhance social mobility and make higher education accessible to all.
Government’s Position and Future Prospects
During the parliamentary debate, Education Minister Josh MacAlister reiterated the government’s stance, indicating that while the repayment threshold for Plan 2 loans will increase to £29,385 in April—above the average graduate salary—there are “enormous pressures on budgets” necessitating the freeze from 2027. He claimed that the average borrower would see only a slight increase in monthly repayments of around £8 due to the freeze.

The Conservatives have proposed capping the interest rate on Plan 2 loans at the RPI rate, alongside plans to cut university places to mitigate debt and redirect funds towards apprenticeships. Meanwhile, Liberal Democrat spokesperson Ian Sollom has called for the government to reverse its decision to freeze repayment thresholds and to implement a more equitable interest structure that does not rely on RPI inflation.
Why it Matters
The growing unrest surrounding the student loan system reflects broader societal concerns about financial equity and the burden of education debt. As graduates grapple with increasingly daunting loan repayments that seem out of step with their earnings, the call for reform resonates deeply. Addressing these issues is not just about alleviating financial stress; it’s about ensuring that access to education remains a right, not a privilege. The outcome of this debate could shape the future landscape of higher education in the UK and the lives of an entire generation of students.