In a passionate plea for change, over 20 Labour MPs have rallied together, urging the government to take immediate action to reform the student loan system in England. Highlighting what they describe as “unfair” interest rates and the detrimental impact of repayment terms, these politicians are advocating for a more equitable approach to student financing in the country.
The Debate in Parliament
During a recent debate in Westminster Hall, MP Jas Athwal led the charge, calling for a rise in the salary threshold that triggers student loan repayments and a reduction in interest rates. This push comes in the wake of criticisms regarding the financial burden placed on students and graduates alike, with Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch later echoing these sentiments at Prime Minister’s Questions, labelling the current situation a “debt trap.”
Sir Keir Starmer, Leader of the Opposition, assured that the government would explore options to create a fairer system. The complexities of the current loan structure mean that the interest rates depend on when students attended university and the specific loan plan they are on. For instance, those who started university in 2023 face an interest rate of 4.3%, while graduates from 2012 to 2023 are subjected to RPI inflation rates, currently at 3.8% plus additional charges based on earnings.
Freezing the Threshold: A Policy Under Fire
Concerns have intensified since the government’s announcement in the autumn Budget that the repayment threshold for Plan 2 loans would be frozen for three years starting April 2027. Critics argue that this decision effectively shifts the goalposts, forcing graduates to contribute more than they would if thresholds had increased in line with inflation. Athwal firmly stated that the system is “in urgent need of reform,” stressing that mere adjustments would not suffice.
“Students begin accruing interest even before they graduate,” Athwal lamented, emphasising that many find their loan balances increasing despite making regular payments. He pointed out that middle-income earners tend to be disproportionately affected, as they struggle to pay off their loans while facing rising interest rates.
Personal Accounts of Struggle
The debate was not just theoretical; several MPs shared heartfelt stories from their constituents. Labour MP Luke Charters, who holds a Plan 2 loan himself, described the current system as “a dog’s dinner.” Chris Hinchliff, another graduate, referred to the government’s decision to freeze repayment thresholds as a “misstep,” urging immediate action before the next general election.
Kate Osborne, representing Jarrow and Gateshead East, revealed that she had received over 700 messages from individuals sharing their distressing experiences with student debt. Some constituents reported owing as much as £60,000, with their total debt spiralling while they worked full-time.
Bell Ribeiro-Addy, MP for Clapham and Brixton Hill, took a stark stance, comparing the terms of student loans to those offered by loan sharks. Several Labour MPs, including Osborne and Ribeiro-Addy, suggested the complete abolition of tuition fees to enhance social mobility and make education more accessible.
Government’s Response and Future Outlook
During PMQs, Badenoch highlighted that all political parties have contributed to the rising costs of higher education. She challenged Starmer on whether he would support reducing interest rates on student loans, to which he responded by condemning the Conservatives for creating a “broken” system.

In reaction to the debate, Education Minister Josh MacAlister reaffirmed the government’s commitment to assessing the student loan structure. He noted the planned increase of the repayment threshold for Plan 2 loans to £29,385 in April, which is above the average graduate salary. However, he justified the need for a freeze by citing “enormous pressures on budgets” and the importance of fairness across the education sector.
The Conservative party has proposed to cap interest rates at RPI, while also announcing plans to close 100,000 university places to alleviate debt, redirecting funds towards apprenticeships instead. Meanwhile, the Liberal Democrats have called for reversing the freeze on repayment thresholds and redesigning the interest structure to be more progressive.
Why it Matters
The ongoing debate surrounding student loans is more than just a matter of policy; it reflects the very real struggles faced by graduates in today’s economy. With rising living costs and stagnant wages, many young people find themselves ensnared in a financial web that seems impossible to escape. Reforming the student loan system is not just a political necessity but a moral obligation to ensure that higher education remains a viable path for all, regardless of their socioeconomic background. As the voices of concerned MPs and constituents grow louder, the government is under increasing pressure to act decisively, lest it risk further alienating a generation already burdened by debt.